Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An eye for an eye...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...and a groin for a groin? :thinking:

It seems the Packers might possibly also be down a starting corner tomorrow thanks to, coincidentally enough, a groin injury

The Packers made a late addition to their injury report on Friday and it adds to the uncertainty about who they’ll have in the secondary against the Panthers.

Cornerback Jaire Alexander was added to the report as a limited participant in practice because of a groin injury. He has been listed as questionable to play against Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Lol

Turner makes the gameplan for the offense.

Lol

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Probably the team with Aaron Rodgers at QB. 

Lmfaoooo 

36 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

That’s what I’m saying not criticizing but wondering do we attack a team as much as we think we should. I’m starting to think maybe it’s because we’re limited with Kyles shaky deep ball so we’re somewhat limited. This week is no different if we’re in any type of snow Ron may scrap any normal passing plays past ten yards and go full conservative all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

What worries me isn’t Cockrell, cause I agree he’s played well. What worries me is Rogers targeting the guy who now has to come off the bench and take Cockrell’s spot, which is Elliot. Much and more might depend on how he can hold up in coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world. This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.
    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle. Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
×
×
  • Create New...