Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen: Change leads to change


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

To be clear, I didn't really think Olsen was going to be back next year anyway, but reading that comment makes me think it's even less likely than it would have been.

The question that comes to mind now is how many other veterans or free agents might decide they're not necessarily on board for a rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Let's say you're James Bradberry or Shaq Thompson. Does change lead to "change" for you too?

Don't worry, friend. I've been assured by Mr. Tepper that we have a great talent evaluator at GM. I'm sure that person will wisely use our viable resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Im fine with it. This culture was great on the surface but it wasnt about winning or even putting the best players on the field. Thank you and good luck.

Unfortunately this is the truth and has been for a long time 

We were content with being average as long as we had a nice and pleasant community. 

It's not that I want a bunch of divas. It's just that I'm tired of not being a consistent winning team because the focus is on having a bunch of content and pleasant people on the team who go out on their own terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce and Dave will determine how many games this team wins next year. It’s not on the WRs. The RBs. LBs. This is about 2 things: 1. Can Bryce continue to come up big in the few key downs that decide most games?  2. Can Canales evolve his play calling to counter punch like the big boys do. Half time adjustments.  teams that score 30+ points on the regular win more games than not. That’s on Bryce and Dave. The offense is top 10 at every position group, save for TE and QB. A baller TE is gravy but not crucial when the receivers are dudes.  The defense is the defense. It’ll be better this season, hopefully by a large margin, but Dave/Bryce is really where it’s at. 
    • Normally I'd wholeheartedly agree with this. But I feel like teams figured out this offense after the Raiders game. Bryce was so inept the first 2 games that we couldn't really even run the offense. Dalton's first game showed what we had. But after that game, coverages got a lot tighter and windows were smaller. When Bryce came back in, his ability to extend plays made a big difference. It's really difficult to stop a QB that can beat/escape 1on1 tacklers. It puts a lot of pressure on the defense when you blitz. And he was completing throws in tight coverage with anticipation. Point being Bryce wasn't throwing to wide open receivers that were schemed open by the offense. Occasionally yes. But not often. 
    • With the additions we've made to our roster combined with the state of the division and the conference as a whole there is no excuse for this team not to make a legitimate push for 8-9 wins. Anything less is honestly inexcusable. There will be no more free passes for being a doormat in this iteration of the league where even mediocre teams are competing for playoff spots.
×
×
  • Create New...