Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case to draft a QB at #7


MHS831

Recommended Posts

This will rile up the nut huggers, but it is an exercise in multiple perspective taking, a form of intelligence that permits one to consider alternatives to his or her own bias in a search for truth over appeasement.  So stop frothing and read this with an open mind, understanding that no decision is smart unless all options have been considered before making it. I like the case made here, by the way, but do not know that this is what I would do.

First, the only QB worth taking at #7 would be Tua (assuming Burrow is gone).  Personally, I think he is coming out (will announce Monday) and I would be shocked if he managed to slip by the Dolphins (5) and Chargers (6).  However, free agency can change a lot of scenarios.  . Tagovailoa completed 71.4 percent of his passes for 33 touchdowns and three interceptions in nine games. How do you let that go by?

 

If you noticed, Tua is LEFT HANDED.  That puts our best OL on his blindside---suddenly, we do not need an elite LT.  Now we can develop Little (as God intended) and find a G and/or C.  So drafting Tua eliminates the paranoia about LT.  It is almost a "no brainer" because we address needs at the game's top 2 positions with one pick.

A healthy Cam in 2020 is still a 31-year old running QB in a contract year.  He will seek a lucrative deal, probably in the $35m range. Nobody wants to see Cam replaced this way, but if you put your business hat on, his health concerns and salary demands put all of the risk on the Panthers if they commit to him.  Tepper knows risk. Doing that during a "rebuild" makes little sense.  A healthy Cam is worth $20m if he is developing Tua, but once he becomes a free agent, I do not see a third contract in the cards.  Would it be smarter to draft Tua and trade Cam?  To me, if Tua is there, the dilemma about Cam is, "do you want to trade him now or keep him for a year at $21m?"

The Cam supporters will argue, "Yeah, but what about 2015 and he has looked good when healthy.  How many games is that, dating back to 2017?  If you are the owner, Cam's health has cost your season ticket holders 2 seasons worth of hard-earned season passes, parking, etc.  Even if Cam gets a clean bill of health, how long will that last?  Sure, no player is guaranteed a clean bill of health, but Cam's playing style has led to him being hit more than any other QB in NFL history.  He takes on contact and leaps into the air over piles of defenders.  Did the QBs in the NFL playing after 35 years of age do that?  Which ones?  Cam may have a year or two or three left, but ultimately, we are going to need a QB. 

Ideally, what better scenario than to draft Tua and let him play behind Cam for a year?  Or what better scenario than to draft a QB and have him on a rookie contract for four years while you use the money you would have spent on Cam to rebuild the team?  Do we really need a $21m QB when we are rebuilding?  Keeping Cam is a romantic, emotional idea more than a practical one.  Get mad at that comment, but if Tua is somehow there, he makes a lot of sense.

That is the best argument I can make for Tua at #7.

Next:  The case for drafting a WR (Jeudy) at #7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

You better include gifs/tweets of this dudes ability to run EVERY route.

Cooper, Ridley and now Jeudy. 3 of the best route runners you’ll ever see. 

You are getting ahead of me Fua! I think Jeudy is better than the other 2.  Everyone who passes on him will look back in 5 years and question why they did not take him---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I find myself agreeing with your opinion more than others lately.. I can see getting the best WR or CB as a path of improvement just like getting another hog Mollie..

This is my argument, not my opinion, but I get what you are saying.  My point is--we have many needs--to focus on the OL is to neglect the other needs--at least in discussions.  We should be considering DBs, DTs, OTs, QBs, etc as we look forward---before free agency---none of this will matter afterwards.  And I thought everyone agrees with me---this is a bit shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

How do you let that go by?

Maybe because the same type of injury ended the career of one of the greatest athletes this country has ever seen in Bo Jackson.

And, doesn't it make perfect sense to draft a QB after a major surgery to replace a QB who just underwent a major surgery?

*DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT NECESSARILY AGREE WITH THIS* but don't be surprised to see Herbert or Fromm drafted come April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Tua declares, there is no way he makes it past Dolphins AND Chargers.  He's not special enough to mortgage future drafts by moving up.

So this case is a moot point.

Oh, Burrow won't even have his seat warm at the draft before his name is called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...