Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview Vikes OC on Thursday


Jmac

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, joeyxfresco said:

Nothing innovative about him. His last few drives on Sunday were nothing but vanilla.

I mean they won the toss and scored a TD on the first possession of OT. the game winning play where he got the nickle CB matched up with Rudolph on the outside was a stroke of brilliance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people expect Stefanski to call plays as a HC ? You shouldn't judge a head coach candidate based only on his play calling, he would have help from coordinators. Which begs another question: if not the play calling, then what to look for ? How would you determine who is a good coaching candidate given we have limited information ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest hesitation for me is him never being a head coach on any level.  I however think this is a legit possibility and wouldn't be mad.  He has a lot to prove if given a HC position.  He was my early prediction so I'll stick with him for who I think we hire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kinographer said:

I don't get the hype around him. Like, I even understood the draw to Rhule and McCarthy to an extent, but not this guy.

Lot's of these can be these guys who stuck around teams for a while and been someone league circles keep their eyes on but don't publicize.  He managed to stick around with Brad Childress, Leslie Frazier, and now Mike Zimmer.  Consistently promoted every few seasons.  Seems like a smart guy.  So, I'm not saying he's a for sure hit but it makes sense why team's are asking about him given how he's risen within that organization.  As a fan, it's hard to really know what he brings.  The track record isn't long but there's positives.  Just matters is he has that head coach gene.  I'm unsure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joeyxfresco said:

Nothing innovative about him. His last few drives on Sunday were nothing but vanilla.

So you watch one game he has ever called and now you are an expert on him? I thought he called a terrific game. It isn't east beating the Saints in NO. He made several gutsy calls in crucial moments that we have never seen in Carolina. Overall he called a good game. His players didn't execute a lot of the plays great but you have to give some credit to the Saints for playing defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, davos said:

Lot's of these can be these guys who stuck around teams for a while and been someone league circles keep their eyes on but don't publicize.  He managed to stick around with Brad Childress, Leslie Frazier, and now Mike Zimmer.  Consistently promoted every few seasons.  Seems like a smart guy.  So, I'm not saying he's a for sure hit but it makes sense why team's are asking about him given how he's risen within that organization.  As a fan, it's hard to really know what he brings.  The track record isn't long but there's positives.  Just matters is he has that head coach gene.  I'm unsure. 

All I want to know is who kept running Cook outside into a wall repeatedly on the goal line and the final drives that stalled and almost gave the Saints the game?

if not for a cousins miracle, like the best pass he’s ever thrown in his life, no one would even look at Stefanski.

i mean, if that was Zimmer choice so be it— but I would have to know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeah, I can get a little of that.  But that's not what he is posting in his argument just now though.   He said people wouldn't even concede to the literal ability to do it when pressed on the literal ability.  I have never seen that.  He maintains it exists somewhere.  I mean, using anomaly games to make arguments about players just isn't the way.   There wasn't a defender within 10 yards of our guys on 2 of those 3 throws Sunday.  No one within 5 on the 3rd.   That's not Bryce Young answering questions about his play downfield..  That's Bryce Young taking advantage of coverage busts by a bad D.  Which hey, that's part of the game too.  Recognition and seeing the field.   It can't totally be dismissed.   That's still good play.  You want your QBs to make those plays.  But it's not getting into the long standing critique of BY IMO.   
    • Deserved, I wouldn’t use that word. Asked for? For sure. Am I upset over it? No.  People forget that AT was throwing his helmet in frustration last season over his QB’s ineptitude. The same QB was pretty inept to start this year, no guarantee AT would have helped him in those games any more than he did last year.  Just sayin.  And Dan doing him a solid probably did not go unnoticed by players around the league. I think it increases his rep with potential FAs. It sure can’t hurt it. 
    • You think that was the fault of the guy that was lighting it up or maybe the bums around him? Funnily enough, those bums are still being bums in his absence. Who would have thought!
×
×
  • Create New...