Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we be trying to extend Moton?


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

Just wondering your thoughts.  Solid player, stays healthy, plug and play, and with a little more help on the O Line, maybe a top flight R Tackle?

 

IMO, we should be sitting down with him now, before he gets to the last year of his deal.

Just curious what everyone else thinks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. Moton is the best OL on the team. It’s funny that this is even a question. Panthers fans are constantly crying about going OT at pick 7 to fix the OL and here we are trying to figure if we should extend Moton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moton is set to be criminally underpaid for the upcoming season. Lock him in now, throw decent bucks his way and give him a bonus for work done well. If paid decently and treated well, he's the kind of guy that could have a long, steady and sturdy career here.

He's one of those foundation blocks that are so vitally important in a rebuild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ship said:

I’m guessing we’ll treat him as our franchise RT and pay him but I saw him get beat plenty last season.

To be fair he didn't have much help inside. Turner was getting beat like a drum last year when he wasn't injured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting quality OT's do not grow on trees, whether it's RT or LT.  He may never play in a Pro Bowl, but if he brings competent play to the RT position for the next 4-5 years, it suddenly becomes that position that you just don't have to think about.  We could use a few of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...