Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Extending Shaq vs Bradberry... another Hurney mistake?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Guess everyone knows James is looking for top CB money, I really don’t see how the Panthers can afford it or will even entertain the thought of paying him that kind of money when the roster looks like a hunk of Swiss cheese. 
 

Was just wondering what you guys think about Hurney extending Shaq instead of Brad now that we will more than likely lose our best CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Both should have been done last year at much lower prices. That’s why you get to Moton and Samuel now. Not next year. 
 

   Shaq is young enough to be effective through his contract. It’s an OK deal. Little too much but not enough to hurt if he plays decent. And it shouldn’t affect JB decision. If you think JB is going to be a top 10 CB in 3 years, you sign him. If not, don’t. 
 

  Just don’t tag him. That’s useless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is a mistake, yet nothing is a mistake. 

Once you release all your expectations and begin to accept that this football team is destined for perpetual failure and disappointment, minuscule decisions like this are just lint on your boobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq had a number that was close to what we wanted to retain him at, Bradberry did not. 

If James ever improves his ball skills then he'd earn more respect on a national level. 

Not a mistake at all, these things happen. Like any of us would be happy with Bradberry at his rumored number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

The way the rebuild is going on I don't see why we didn't just let Shaq and Bradberry go. We could of just got a cheaper LB. Nobody on this board likes Shaq anyway. 

I think Shaq is a good guy and has been a good player......Just not good enough for a second contract. When he had a death in the family last season the writing was on the wall that he was gonna get resigned. No way that happens and at the end of season the Panthers tell him to go find a new team. We all know how this team loves to build these emotional connections with the players which lead to bad business decisions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carolina seems to put a big value on the MLB position in terms of draft capital spent and contracts handed out. Picking Shaq over Bradberry is consistent with that but if it's correct remains to be seen. 

I do agree with picking Shaq over Bradberry. Shaq provides more versatility in what defenses he fits into. Bradberry is a zone corner and the FO couldn't have known what the new DC would run when they decided to sign Shaq. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...