Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stirs said:

The vote is the one big equalizer in America, yet people do not take it seriously and just leave all their thinking for someone else.  All the "someone elses" are happy to manipulate and promise them the world and America will just go along with whatever bell rings the clearest for them

Voting rights have been eroded over time and one party is quite open about how they do not want to see increases in voting. That is mind blowing. Just look at how badly our voting is handled compared to most of the first world. But it isn't accidental. The power structure constantly struggle not to get more people to vote but to manipulate voting to get their desired outcome. It is completely ridiculous.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

The “outside agitators” phrase from the media has been used during different unrest/uprising events throughout US history to downplay the anger of oppressed people/supporters. I don’t think “the bulk” were people trying to take advantage of the situation. There definitely were some. But that phrase is used to divert attention. People were pissed the fug off and exhausted all options. In Minneapolis specifically,  they blew up a fuging police precinct, burned down half a city and looted corporate buildings, targeting very specific things. I know this is a separate discussion but I agree with some of your takes. Not all but some.

cnn is bullshit and that was one of the most badass things I’ve seen in my life. 

Yeah, I will freely admit that I was happy to see CNN get smashed up. They deserve a fuging wake up call. Killer Mike was 100% right to say what he did about that incident.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I will freely admit that I was happy to see CNN get smashed up. They deserve a fuging wake up call. Killer Mike was 100% right to say what he did about that incident.

They love that kind of stuff though.  Its another thing to cover and they love playing the victim card.  They couldn't contain their grins from the good fortune of having one of their reporters arrested live on air.

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the media has done a good enough job of undermining themselves

So dang true.

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I even hear people say things like, "Well, I watch Fox and MSNBC and that way I have a counterpoint." The problem with that is constantly consuming blatant, naked propaganda is that even little bits of that will slip through and their sensationalism will still have subtle impacts. If nothing else, it is stressful to watch/listen to that trash. People need to disengage more and stop consuming from these bad actors. They hurt society and there is no benefit to feeding those machines.

I do the CNN/Fox thing.  But I also spend a ton of time online researching the facts/details and forming my own opinion on things.  But you are right, it can get really stressful sometimes and you really need to disengage for a little bit to gain some perspective.  If you stay engaged too long you start to buy in to the hype on the TV instead of looking at your actual life around you, which are two different things.  My favorites are the morning shows.  Those lead into the heavier news portion of the day and then I typically don't watch at night anymore because its too much propaganda and bluster.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

They love that kind of stuff though.  Its another thing to cover and they love playing the victim card.  They couldn't contain their grins from the good fortune of having one of their reporters arrested live on air.

So dang true.

I do the CNN/Fox thing.  But I also spend a ton of time online researching the facts/details and forming my own opinion on things.  But you are right, it can get really stressful sometimes and you really need to disengage for a little bit to gain some perspective.  If you stay engaged too long you start to buy in to the hype on the TV instead of looking at your actual life around you, which are two different things.  My favorites are the morning shows.  Those lead into the heavier news portion of the day and then I typically don't watch at night anymore because its too much propaganda and bluster.

I would just swear off Fox and CNN. There is no reason to even give them the time of day. Trust me, you won't be any less informed(more like better informed) and their drivel won't accidentally creep into your head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would just swear off Fox and CNN. There is no reason to even give them the time of day. Trust me, you won't be any less informed(more like better informed) and their drivel won't accidentally creep into your head. 

I don’t watch cable news anymore, but I still glance at their websites too much.

The nbcnews.com site (msnbc) drives me nuts. It’s like reading a college newspaper sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I don’t watch cable news anymore, but I still glance at their websites too much.

The nbcnews.com site (msnbc) drives me nuts. It’s like reading a college newspaper sometimes. 

I feel like I have a good grasp on what's real and what's not when I'm watching the news shows on TV.  I have a hard time doing that on CNN.com or Fox.com so I avoid them.  If I'm reading print media/websites I go to other sources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Are these Hospital Numbers just COVID patients, or just in General. It makes a big difference. 

 

 

52 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Are these Hospital Numbers just COVID patients, or just in General. It makes a big difference. 

 

I asked that a week ago and they gave me the big eye roll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Are these Hospital Numbers just COVID patients, or just in General. It makes a big difference. 

 

Depends on which number.  

They generally put out a COVID number. 1404 in SC. That means 1404 people are hospitalized with COVID. 

Then they often talk about % of beds occupied all over the state.  That number generally includes everything when discussed. Anyone in a bed.   SC is currently hovering around 75% of beds being full.   Your hospital could be at 95% or it could be at 60%.  They (SC does at least) also list the % full by county so if you just have one hospital in your county  you would know exactly where your hospital stands.  Some are  being forced to go back to shutting down elective procedures again. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...