Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Zero reason to postpone the draft


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

It would be a big mistake to postpone the draft. Teams need as much time as possible to get the rookies ready for the season. 

Instead. adapt and change. Picks can be made remotely via phone/internet. Players can be at home with their families for their reactions. This may even be more entertaining than all the contrived hoopla (money generating) fluff the NFL has turned the draft into. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeremy Igo said:

It would be a big mistake to postpone the draft. Teams need as much time as possible to get the rookies ready for the season. 

Instead. adapt and change. Picks can be made remotely via phone/internet. Players can be at home with their families for their reactions. This may even be more entertaining than all the contrived hoopla (money generating) fluff the NFL has turned the draft into. 



Bingo. Send out info for players to use a video service with either webcams or smart devices and let it be them at home doing their thing. Would be MUCH more entertaining. No risk to any employees of the NFL or the players.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lightsout said:



Bingo. Send out info for players to use a video service with either webcams or smart devices and let it be them at home doing their thing. Would be MUCH more entertaining. No risk to any employees of the NFL or the players.

 

I think it would be entertaining as hell to just have the players use their phones. They all know how to. Let them film what and who they want to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    Back to the 1970s. It would be good for todays fans to get a taste of life before ESPN. Having to wait for the local news sports “segment” or the next day in the paper to even know who went where. 
 

    The first draft I watched was 1983 and it was one of the most disappointing experiences of my life. How do you pass on Marino!!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to disagree with you here, even though I agree that they should still go ahead and have the event...in an adapted format.  After the draft there are dead periods where very little gets done anyways.  And some kids literally are forbidden from attending the few basic camps they have early on, because their school's schedule and NFL rules.  So they can afford to push it back, even though I don't like it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

    Back to the 1970s. It would be good for todays fans to get a taste of life before ESPN. Having to wait for the local news sports “segment” or the next day in the paper to even know who went where. 
 

    The first draft I watched was 1983 and it was one of the most disappointing experiences of my life. How do you pass on Marino!!!! 

I wanted the to be the first to say old GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jeremy Igo said:

It would be a big mistake to postpone the draft. Teams need as much time as possible to get the rookies ready for the season. 

Instead. adapt and change. Picks can be made remotely via phone/internet. Players can be at home with their families for their reactions. This may even be more entertaining than all the contrived hoopla (money generating) fluff the NFL has turned the draft into. 

I would agree except that lots of people organize draft parties which isn't smart to do right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the people who make the picks are never actually at the draft anyway.  They just send a low level functionary to the draft to walk the card up to the podium.  There is literally zero functional reason for that to happen as opposed to phoning it in to the league office.  That whole draft spectacle is just for show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, the draft would be a nice distraction, but, at the end of the day, we have bigger fish to fry. 

The NFL will be here when things get back to some normalcy, and that's probably how the league prefers it! They don't want any part of the veil being lifted, because it would ultimately mess with their money---or at least that's the way they see it. It's kind of like how lawmakers don't even want to give even emergency UBI. They know it will end their facade of lies about it, and ultimately people will see that it's doable. And, ironically, it would probably be ultimately good for the NFL from an economic standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NAS said:

I would agree except that lots of people organize draft parties which isn't smart to do right now.  

Well considering the US has 1629 confirmed cases out of an estimated 327,200,000 citizens, even if the actual amount of cases were 100x greater, it would still just be 0.05% of the population. I think that canceling a draft party with your family and friends is a little absurd unless you are in an area rife with cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Well considering the US has 1629 confirmed cases out of an estimated 327,200,000 citizens, even if the actual amount of cases were 100x greater, it would still just be 0.05% of the population. I think that canceling a draft party with your family and friends is a little absurd unless you are in an area rife with cases. 

The CDC is giving out guidelines for a reason. Deaths in both China and Italy have jumped!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes. Big surprise that the man that couldn't even operate a pizza joint even with his name value in Charlotte can't run an NFL front office. Can't get over his 2023 and 2024 draft classes. Taking XL, Brooks, Wallace takes a special skill of incompetence. Can't get over his plan at MLB. Was apart of the Fitterer team and their comedy of errors. We need fresh ideas in the building next year not only at GM, but in our scouting department. 
    • Alabama yes. In general the ‘SEC success guarantees NFL success’ fallacy was really tough to overcome too. You still have to look at the player and extrapolate what their college performance would look like against a team full of NFL vets.    I think 62 SEC players were drafted in 2023. But there were over 1600 players rostered on SEC a teams. You might even  face an SEC defense that had no one drafted. Like Vanderbilt had no one taken in 2025.  So you just can’t blindly hold that hey he was great in the SEC he is a lock. Damn, especially with a weak armed little guy with bad throwing mechanics,     
    • The question was regarding Bryce only play well when the game doesn't matter and us out of reach. Bryce did not have a great 4th quarter but he had a great 1st half.  Started the game 4 of 5 for 45 yards and a passing TD. He made a lot of great plays in the drive where we scored our 2nd TD which was a short run by Chuba.  He also had a great run to pick up a first when the pocket collapsed around him.  Great pocket awareness and plenty fast and athletic enough. The point being he played very well at a time where the game was not out of reach or garbage time. That was my point and those games listed are the evidence that prove that point.
×
×
  • Create New...