Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney not.....bad???? Wut


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

The Patriots, 23rd.  The point is some teams give marginal players more time because they feel obligated to hang on to their draft picks (Hurney).  Others acknowledge a bad pick, cut their loses and move on.

Pretty much.

Somebody tried doing an analysis like this a while back, but the reality is that it ignores so many factors it's pretty much worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I dont get all the Hurney hate.

All of us arm chair GM's can say what we want. None of us would get a SNIFF at the position, meanwhile he has the job. 

His results speak for themself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I dont get all the Hurney hate.

All of us arm chair GM's can say what we want. None of us would get a SNIFF at the position, meanwhile he has the job. 

I'm pretty sure none of us could get an NFL head coaching job either, but Hue Jackson did.

Does that mean he's good at it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its pretty undeniable that Hurney has definitely hit on some star talent, particularly from 2003 - 2008, and then again in 2011. However, I also think that "4-year starter" number is a little misleading. The other, bad part, of Hurney being a GM is the terrible contracts he gave out. We've consistently carried a lot of dead money, which I think forced the team to play draft picks as starters, since we've never been in a good position to sign multiple, high profile free agents.

So yes, he may have the highest amount of drafted players that have started 4+ years, but some of those players would have been benched or released if we had better cap management. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Growl said:

somebody posted not so long ago that the most you can expect out of a draft from a good GM is "3-4 impact players"

like lol.

 Most teams consider 1 a success.

still I'll wait to see where my criticism does and doesn't lie until I see what we've done with the QB position.

No they don’t. The article literally says most teams get two eventual starters per draft. A success isn’t 1 or 2, it’s 3 or more. Being below average or average isn’t success. Look at the Saints recent drafts that pulled them from behind us to way better the past 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

No they don’t. The article literally says most teams get two eventual starters per draft. A success isn’t 1 or 2, it’s 3 or more. Being below average or average isn’t success. Look at the Saints recent drafts that pulled them from behind us to way better the past 4 years.

Hurney completely poo the bed with the 2019 draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...