Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule has only met 20 of the Panthers 90 players


trueblade

Recommended Posts

Maybe he means that there are only 20 players he believes are worthy enough of to be called Panthers.  The rest are placeholders for future players to come either via the draft or future FA. 

Just a thought... :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DFive said:

Maybe he means that there are only 20 players he believes are worthy enough of to be called Panthers.  The rest are placeholders for future players to come either via the draft or future FA. 

Just a thought... :thinking:

No way it is that many 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense, he probably met with the top players shortly after being hired and then the virus hit and he hasn't been able to meet the others in person due to that.

Everything we've heard about him is that his players love him, doesn't seem like the type of guy who would only have even "met" with only 20 of the players by teleconference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive been saying it for some time and recently Peter King just said it too- This is the hardest job in NFL history. Simply can not judge Rhule this up coming year, crazy as it sounds A LOT more could happen to make things even worse. 

Not a fan of the hire or ALL THE BAYLOR BROS hiring, but I respect the hell of him attacking and not using it as a excuse. "Find a way, bro" was his quote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...