Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper blurb in WashPost


Paa Langfart

Recommended Posts

Quote

David Tepper

NET WORTH: $12 billion

SOURCE OF WEALTH: Hedge funds

CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE: The founder and president of global hedge fund Appaloosa Management, and owner of the NFL’s Carolina Panthers, declined to answer questions about his covid-19 relief giving. A spokesperson for Tepper forwarded a Forbes article in which Tepper said he’d given about $22 million to efforts including Feeding America and Blue Meridian, which is providing direct cash assistance to those in need. Tepper’s foundation has also paid for mobile hotspots with prepaid Internet service for schools in Charlotte, where the Panthers are located.

Tepper told Forbes he expected to give more money as the crisis continued, and implored his fellow billionaires to ramp up their giving.

“We hope that everybody steps up,” Tepper said. “I think in general, in times of need, people have to step up if they have the ability to step up. Period.”

For the median American, Tepper’s giving so far is the equivalent of spending $178.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/what-the-50-richest-americans-have-given-for-covid-19-relief/2020/06/02/bb70b94c-9a10-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the median American... basically, if he were you and I this is how much of his money he would have given away proportionately. It's a disingenuous stat in it tries to make him look like some kind of skinflint cheapskate and completely washes over the astronomical impact that giving $22 million dollars does have.

And in the end, if every American gave $178 towards helping out, that would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $63 billion. That'd fix a lot. He's doing his part and to decry his efforts as tightwaddery is just kind of sad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

For the median American... basically, if he were you and I this is how much of his money he would have given away proportionately. It's a disingenuous stat in it tries to make him look like some kind of skinflint cheapskate and completely washes over the astronomical impact that giving $22 million dollars does have.

And in the end, if every American gave $178 towards helping out, that would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $63 billion. That'd fix a lot. He's doing his part and to decry his efforts as tightwaddery is just kind of sad.

 

^
Nailed it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

For the median American... basically, if he were you and I this is how much of his money he would have given away proportionately. It's a disingenuous stat in it tries to make him look like some kind of skinflint cheapskate and completely washes over the astronomical impact that giving $22 million dollars does have.

And in the end, if every American gave $178 towards helping out, that would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $63 billion. That'd fix a lot. He's doing his part and to decry his efforts as tightwaddery is just kind of sad.

 

There are at least 40 million of us who are currently unemployed and wondering how we will feed our family

next month, keep the lights on, and keep what health insurance we have.  I don't think it's asking too much to expect one of the richest people in the world, to do more to help those at the bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

There are at least 40 million of us who are currently unemployed and wondering how we will feed our family

next month, keep the lights on, and keep what health insurance we have.  I don't think it's asking too much to expect one of the richest people in the world, to do more to help those at the bottom.

My local food bank says a donation of $1 can provide 4 meals. So Tepper donated the equivalent of 88 million meals. I wouldn't call that something to sneeze at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

For the median American... basically, if he were you and I this is how much of his money he would have given away proportionately. It's a disingenuous stat in it tries to make him look like some kind of skinflint cheapskate and completely washes over the astronomical impact that giving $22 million dollars does have.

And in the end, if every American gave $178 towards helping out, that would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $63 billion. That'd fix a lot. He's doing his part and to decry his efforts as tightwaddery is just kind of sad.

 

I would pie twice if I could.  Toppers a good guy but just because he made a lot of money makes him an vil person in many eyes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

People who complain about the rich not giving enough usually aren’t giving anything.

Not true. I complain about the rich not giving enough and I give a good portion of what I make to others less fortunate and donate hundreds of hours of volunteer work helping others. And I have done that for the past 30 years. Part of the problem in society is painting everyone with the same brush. 

My experience has been that those with the least often give what they can because they realize they could be there themselves or were at sometime in the past. Rich people sometimes think they earned and deserve everything they get without acknowledging the advantages they have had or the people who helped them along the way. Tepper comes from blue collar and seems to better understand the plight of those who have little or nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2020 at 2:23 PM, Paa Langfart said:

There are at least 40 million of us who are currently unemployed and wondering how we will feed our family

next month, keep the lights on, and keep what health insurance we have.  I don't think it's asking too much to expect one of the richest people in the world, to do more to help those at the bottom.

True, but we can't realistically say that at $22 million (and probably growing) he hasn't done something. I mean, that would be a hard yardstick for anyone to measure up to.

Unemployment sucks and right now is probably the most desperate time to be unemployed in the last 80 years without a doubt. But there are other doors to throw eggs at on Richman's Row who deserve it more than Tepper right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...