Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston comments on Donte Jacksons' development.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Yeah it's better than to hear the opposite (or maybe not since sometimes a teammate lighting a fire under a player's ass can help him develop) but I won't read too much into this. Need to see the results on the field, which we haven't seen since spurts in his rookie year. Reminds me a lot of Josh who flashed a bit his rookie year then got in the doghouse in year 2 and struggled and then midway through year 3 he broke out. Hoping we can get a similar path from Donte but not going to hold my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully he takes up Tre's coverage skills and not his angles.

Tre's a good voice to have on this team, I know everyone hates his tackling angles but he's good at what a safety is supposed to be good at (Coverage) unlike a former safety here (Reid)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our receving unit is no slouch, but NONE of them are the size of the receivers our division has. 

I don't trust Donte to go toe to toe with any of the 6 starting WRs from a pure physical standpoint. 

Dude can look much better in practice against 5'11 Samuel and barely 6'0 Moore, but I doubt he'll look the same against the freight trains that are Evans, Jones, and Thomas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Our receving unit is no slouch, but NONE of them are the size of the receivers our division has. 

I don't trust Donte to go toe to toe with any of the 6 starting WRs from a pure physical standpoint. 

Dude can look much better in practice against 5'11 Samuel and barely 6'0 Moore, but I doubt he'll look the same against the freight trains that are Evans, Jones, and Thomas. 

Wasnt a fan of the pick and still not hot on him, but he does have some dawg in him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norman was in the dog house because Rivera lacked coaching skills and ability. Much like Fox, he did not teach players and he did not teach fundamentals. He favored experience over talent. Something SB winning coaches don’t do. It’s why he favors vets. It’s a lazy way to coach, but effective with the right pieces - but there is no risk. Players matter more than scheme/coaching.

The only reason Norman saw the field again was injury..and the fact the secondary basically collapsed during his leave but was significantly better before and after his leave. The injury didn’t all of a sudden make things click for Norman and neither did sitting on the bench. Teaching/coaching him would have, before it was forced. I can’t help but think had Norman had an adaptable coach he would’ve learned much quicker. Regardless he should never have been taken off the field if you consider the evidence.
 

And when he came back, because Rivera didn’t have a choice, the scheming favored him to his strengths much more than before. Rivera was forced to actually adapt to using the defense to Norman’s strengths and he had success. Norman still played with boneheaded instincts, except now they were accounted for.

I think Rhule will do a much better job in this category. I’m not too worried. But Jackson will still have to do his part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad Tre is coming out and saying this, someone needs to be in Jackson's corner.

I hope we see that transition. He has to move from relying on physical prowess and be more of a student of the game and the opposition.

Why we haven't flat out begged Chris Gamble to coach our DBs, I have no idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Norman was in the dog house because Rivera lacked coaching skills and ability. Much like Fox, he did not teach players and he did not teach fundamentals. He favored experience over talent. Something SB winning coaches don’t do. It’s why he favors vets. It’s a lazy way to coach, but effective with the right pieces - but there is no risk. Players matter more than scheme/coaching.

The only reason Norman saw the field again was injury..and the fact the secondary basically collapsed during his leave but was significantly better before and after his leave. The injury didn’t all of a sudden make things click for Norman and neither did sitting on the bench. Teaching/coaching him would have, before it was forced. I can’t help but think had Norman had an adaptable coach he would’ve learned much quicker. Regardless he should never have been taken off the field if you consider the evidence.
 

And when he came back, because Rivera didn’t have a choice, the scheming favored him to his strengths much more than before. Rivera was forced to actually adapt to using the defense to Norman’s strengths and he had success. Norman still played with boneheaded instincts, except now they were accounted for.

I think Rhule will do a much better job in this category. I’m not too worried. But Jackson will still have to do his part.

I think it was a give and take thing. Norman was always a subpar athlete for an NFL CB. He had tremendous instincts, ball skills, and confidence. That made him want to constantly freelance. Rivera HATED that. He wanted him to just play his role in the defense as scripted. Norman HATED that. They finally got on the same page in 2015 and it was magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think it was a give and take thing. Norman was always a subpar athlete for an NFL CB. He had tremendous instincts, ball skills, and confidence. That made him want to constantly freelance. Rivera HATED that. He wanted him to just play his role in the defense as scripted. Norman HATED that. They finally got on the same page in 2015 and it was magic.

This.

Norman was in the dog house for good reason. Rivera's defenses required each guy to do his job, and Norman would freelance and do his own thing too often. Once it finally clicked, we got the end of 2014 and 2015. It was a thing of beauty. 

Then he left and was average to below average again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...