Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Perspective


The Huddler

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, The Huddler said:

 Have some perspective and patience.  

Gosh, you realize who you're talking to?  This is the Huddle! =P 

Honestly, I wasn't too surprised we lost.  Sure, the Raiders were extremely beatable, but they also spent time in player led workouts.  We didn't have that.  Heck, the fact the game was so close despite some big ole self inflicted wounds was pretty good for a first outing for a new team with little NFL experience for the coaching staff.

We all knew this would be a season of growing pains.  Let the pains begin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Perspective: The Panthers are currently on a 9 game losing streak and just lost to one of the most beatable teams on their schedule this year.

speaking of perspective, yours seems to be very narrowed.

 

not like a new regime has been implemented across the board and you know, a global pandemic that has shut down the world.  Theres a whole lot thats happened since that 8th game to continue that "streak". 

 

 

 

go order a pizza 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

speaking of perspective, yours seems to be very narrowed.

 

not like a new regime has been implemented across the board and you know, a global pandemic that has shut down the world.  Theres a whole lot thats happened since that 8th game to continue that "streak". 

 

 

 

go order a pizza 

A loss is a loss. Doesn’t matter if it’s by 1 point or 100, who is the coach, or who the players are. Goes down on the stat sheet the same way. 

My perspective will start to change once they start winning a few games. I have a bad feeling this is a 2-3 win squad this year, so forgive me for not being super thrilled about that. I’ve watched a massive amount of Panthers football over the last 20 years or so, and I know a bad team when I see it. This might be the most exciting bad team the Panthers have ever fielded though, so there’s that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KillerKat said:

@Jeremy Igo  Just saw your pinned thread and thank you for addressing former fans causing problems, but you also need to address current ones that start the whole debate of Cam vs Teddy with posts similar to the first reply to this thread.

It was a legitimate question and I was genuinely curious, it was relative to putting things into ‘perspective’ for a lot of fans -would you rather I create a thread on it?

Here is an idea stop whining like a bitch and avoid threads, posts and put users you’re too fragile to handle on ignore like a big boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, onmyown said:

The cam fanboys gave him every excuse in the book, literally every single one. But Teddy gets none, no ‘controversies’, nothing, nada.

Why?

Its not excuses, its frustration. The receiving corps we trotted out yesterday was better than anything we had for 9 years of Cam. Why? Why did we immediately pair our new QB with a new innovative young mind OC but for 7 years Cam had a 1970s nepotism OC and a 70 year old

im more so frustrated that we never did the things we did for Teddy for Cam even though Cam was the superior player and had the higher ceiling

 

as bad as our defense is though the more and more it makes sense that we let Cam go, because Cam will be 35 by the time we are able to put a formidable defense on the field 

 

i dont think Teddy is a bad QB at all, but he will never be able to carry an offense by himself like Cam and will need to always be surrounded by talented skill players, which means our defense is going to have to be built with solid drafting not just in the first 2 rounds and good free agent signings, which I dont think any reasonable person thinks Hurney is capable of.

The prior regime knew they could pour all resources into the defense and just having Cam on offense would be enough to score more points than our defense should allow. It ALMOST got us a Super Bowl

With Teddy were going to have to have playmakers all over the field on offense to score points and with the way the defense looks it probably wont be enough most games. So its going to take building a balanced and talented roster on both sides of the ball to be a contending team, and the biggest issue right now is we have a GM that really has not been able to do that most of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillaCamNewton said:

Its not excuses, its frustration. The receiving corps we trotted out yesterday was better than anything we had for 9 years of Cam. Why? Why did we immediately pair our new QB with a new innovative young mind OC but for 7 years Cam had a 1970s nepotism OC and a 70 year old

im more so frustrated that we never did the things we did for Teddy for Cam even though Cam was the superior player and had the higher ceiling

 

as bad as our defense is though the more and more it makes sense that we let Cam go, because Cam will be 35 by the time we are able to put a formidable defense on the field 

It feels almost as if the Cam era was under a different head coach.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I saw plenty of reasons for optimism yesterday too.

I mean, when you look at all the factors going into this season, all the inexperience and turnover, and then add covid and the resulting reduction in preparation on top of everything, I'd say we played shockingly well. Could have very well won it.

The defense is going to take time, but that was always going to be the case.

379lzy.jpg

Edit: And it was a fun game to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...