Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was the defense better because Whitehead and Jackson didn’t play?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ScottyAbe31 said:

This a thread regarding defensive play. Who we were missing on offence does not affect who our defence faced.

You are correct I apologize but offensive performance does impact the defense being in the field more or less time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Jackson is so hard to understand for me. Is he a positive or negative on the field?

he's either playing hurt, has enough film on him that he's being exposed, had massive expectations after his first season, or some combination of the three. 

Pretty clear our best defense is the group we had out there today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

he's either playing hurt, has enough film on him that he's being exposed, had massive expectations after his first season, or some combination of the three. 

Pretty clear our best defense is the group we had out there today

Dude...

Jackson has dealt with this toe injury for nearly two months,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Lol what? Donte Jackson has been good this year.

I agree... he is far from perfect but he was picking balls off ever other game it seemed.. and then on the return..good luck catching him. Would rather have him than not. I think the huddle view jackson the same way they do or did samuel before this season. Hate for him is greatly overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you need someone to run your multi-billion dollar business, maaayyyybe don't hire a guy whose previous work experience includes repeated blows to the head and literal brain damage but IDK.
    • Extrapolate that with every QB for that matter. I guarantee you there's quite a bit of missed opportunities and yards left on the field for everyone. Many NFL QBs deal with WRs not putting in A+ effort, subpar o-line play and other deficiencies. The great ones are able to rise above these issues and create opportunities for plays. Guys like Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes can both play in and out of structure, as well as find ways to get yards when things break down and mask mistakes by throwing guys open, creating opportunities from nothing, etc. Bryce Young has only shown he's able to make things happen when the rest of the team picks up his slack. Very rarely does he create those opportunities himself. When this is a consistent pattern year after year with Bryce where he shows up lackluster, it's a concern. This is year three and he should be elevating the team as a first overall pick this franchise traded up for.  He was far from elevating anyone against JAX. In fact, he needed others to elevate and create for him. Excuses may be fine for a rookie, but this is year three for the first overall pick. Not looking good so far.
    • I think the worst issue is coaching. Countless bad snaps, XL not getting his feet in or trying on runs plays, our centre being down field when he didn't need to be. All seem to be from poor coaching for me. I believe Canales is to soft to rip the players a new one when the fug up. Plus I honestly believe that Canales is slow getting his plays in giving Bryce less time to diagnose and adjust to the defence. Don't worry I could of head butted Bryce for that fumble and the 4th down throw aways but the other plays are explainable to me 
×
×
  • Create New...