Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I hope this is the last game we ever see Teddy Bridgewater start a game for the Panthers


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Just now, hepcat said:

He has the weakest arm of any currently starting NFL QB. His weak ass arm is well known by every team and defenses are game planning accordingly.

Please sit him 

He is a joke. An abysmal QB. The guy flat out sucks and there is no other way to put it. He consistently throws short of the end zone and first down markers.0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to pile on him but I don't see the problem with trying out PJ for the remainder of the year if we lose today.

4-8 with 4 games left, just give PJ a go at this point and have him start launching bombs.  

We should just roll with PJ, Cannon & Rodney Smith and see if we've got anything worth a backup role moving forward.

Davis has been admirable but I don't see a point in using him long term.  He'd be great if we were a contender and easing the load on CMC but I don't see an incentive in overloading him the remainder of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Tough because I think it's pretty early to just give up on him, especially when the defense isn't helping matters, but I really want a closer look at PJ.  I'm not sure what Teddy offers over him outside of experience and PJ can do things he can't.

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

Talking about other games this year really. 

I think it'd be best for everyone if we let the QBs compete for the starting job but I believe Rhule/Brady have tethered themselves to the Bridgewater experiment too hard to do it honestly this year. Might take Tepper intervening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

I was told that PJ Walker's performance was good largely because of the defense, so I guess same thing for Teddy this week but swap good for 'middling' thus far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...