Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I hope this is the last game we ever see Teddy Bridgewater start a game for the Panthers


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Just now, hepcat said:

He has the weakest arm of any currently starting NFL QB. His weak ass arm is well known by every team and defenses are game planning accordingly.

Please sit him 

He is a joke. An abysmal QB. The guy flat out sucks and there is no other way to put it. He consistently throws short of the end zone and first down markers.0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to pile on him but I don't see the problem with trying out PJ for the remainder of the year if we lose today.

4-8 with 4 games left, just give PJ a go at this point and have him start launching bombs.  

We should just roll with PJ, Cannon & Rodney Smith and see if we've got anything worth a backup role moving forward.

Davis has been admirable but I don't see a point in using him long term.  He'd be great if we were a contender and easing the load on CMC but I don't see an incentive in overloading him the remainder of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Tough because I think it's pretty early to just give up on him, especially when the defense isn't helping matters, but I really want a closer look at PJ.  I'm not sure what Teddy offers over him outside of experience and PJ can do things he can't.

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

Talking about other games this year really. 

I think it'd be best for everyone if we let the QBs compete for the starting job but I believe Rhule/Brady have tethered themselves to the Bridgewater experiment too hard to do it honestly this year. Might take Tepper intervening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Keeping the Vikes to 7 is the d not helping matters? What are they supposed to do?

I was told that PJ Walker's performance was good largely because of the defense, so I guess same thing for Teddy this week but swap good for 'middling' thus far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...