Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Bridgewater: Panthers may have panicked late against Vikings


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

How do they deserve some serious throwing under the bus? Can you break down why? They are literally working with a backup QB, backup RB, solid WR's, and offensive line Mr. Scot/know it all thinks is hot ass, and a defense with 6 Rookies starting and the youngest defense in the past 10 years. Can you give me reason why a bunch of Rookie NFL coaches deserve the blame? They have exceeded expectations in my book, and if we had a competent QB that wasn't so mediocre-poo we would have 7 wins by now. 

3rd and goal at the 3, run Davis right up the middle. 4th and goal, run Davis again. If we don't score, Minn has less than a minute to get into FG range to tie the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

season 10 episode 20 GIF

Teddy's carrer. Great backup and not the starter you need. 

Have said it repeatedly. He'd be an ideal backup for the system we're running, and has the kind of character that would make him a good mentor.

I just don't know if he wants that role...or the reduced salary that comes with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Have said it repeatedly. He'd be an ideal backup for the system we're running, and has the kind of character that would make him a good mentor.

I just don't know if he wants that role...or the reduced salary that comes with it.

 

The kind of character that accepts no responsibility and deflects blame? 

Thanks but no thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, therealmjl said:

The kind of character that accepts no responsibility and deflects blame? 

Thanks but no thanks.

I'm not real sure he's going to have a choice.

If the Panthers don't keep him as a starter, I doubt any other starting jobs are going to be available. He'd have to accept a backup role.

And it occurs to me that there is one that might be available in New Orleans depending on how their quarterback situation shakes out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ummm. No. That was a bad play design that had two recievers on top of each other right on the LB's line. Davis thought the ball was going to Anderson too, why else would he have pulled up?

I didn't understand the play design either. Someone ran the wrong route because it ran both players right into each other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Have said it repeatedly. He'd be an ideal backup for the system we're running, and has the kind of character that would make him a good mentor.

I just don't know if he wants that role...or the reduced salary that comes with it.

 

You nailed it. If he wants to be a starter then this all gets dicey. Maybe agree to a win win trade...to Brady's new team next year? He would be tailor made for training a young QB but that is all if he is willing to take that role. No idea right now which way this goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tired of him making excuses, it was not the OC fault, it was not Moore's fault, or the OL's fault. You had the man wide open in the back of the end zone and could not make the throw. You missed that throw (along with a plethora of other throws) and lost the game. PJ should have started this game, at least he has an NFL caliber arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

DJ was wide open and you blew it and now you're to point the finger everywhere else.

Honestly, Teddy shouldn't have a single defender left after that and Rhule should bench his ass. This is the polar opposite of what you want to see our of your QB both in terms of execution in the field and leadership off.

I was very disappointed in Bridgewater and his comments.  He missed receivers all day.  He missed a wide open receiver in the endzone for the win.  Can't believe he threw the coaches under the bus...even saying he would have changed the play [ so he didn't have the throw the ball??].    I criticized Tom Brady for not being a leader and taking responsibility for his mistakes.  I see no difference.  I hope Rhule is really pissed by this.  He needs to give Walker more reps to see what he has.  I would have expected to see Teddy improve throughout the season as he had more time in this offense and more time with the receivers.  Instead, he seems to have regressed. Sit him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This is all you need to know about the loss and Bridgewater's responsibility for it:

image.thumb.png.48cfacd639125079538d47552532dc91.png

 

Yep. D was clearly playing the run so checking into it would have been incorrect. Right play call, piss poor throw. Look at the freaking pocket and the separation. SMH.

Check to the run = give Minnesota less time which only leads to us not having enough time to even attempt a FG. We lose.

Complete pass = 10 point lead. We win.

Sad to see a QB telling us he doesn’t want the ball in his hands as his solution to him blowing the game with a bad throw. Kind of the opposite of Mahomes who wanted the ball in his hands so he could make the east completion to Hill and end the game. Teddy had the chance to end the game again and failed. Simple as that, no need to search for excuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Bridgewater didn't actually use the word "panic". That's an extrapolation by PFT of what he said, and it's a stretch.

I would, however, agree that he could have handled this better.

Actually, he did, according to the article.

“I think we just got to be better from top to bottom from the sideline to executing on the field. It was one of those deals where I feel like we might have panicked a little bit, trying to figure out what play call to call in that situation,” Bridgewater said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaqattaq said:

Actually, he did, according to the article.

“I think we just got to be better from top to bottom from the sideline to executing on the field. It was one of those deals where I feel like we might have panicked a little bit, trying to figure out what play call to call in that situation,” Bridgewater said

Gotcha. Missed that. I was going off what I read last night.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Sad to see a QB telling us he doesn’t want the ball in his hands as his solution to him blowing the game with a bad throw. Kind of the opposite of Mahomes who wanted the ball in his hands so he could make the east completion to Hill and end the game. Teddy had the chance to end the game again and failed. Simple as that, no need to search for excuses.

Why we should have thrown the ball on the last 3rd down : AZCardinals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...