Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby Anderson was not the best signing of the offseason


Hugo

Recommended Posts

Zach Kerr is. He currently sits as the 12th best IDL in the league according to PFF, and he has been a massive disruptor on that D-line. He also seems to be a great locker room guy. The craziest part is that we sign him to a 2 years, $3,000,000 contract with an average annual salary of $1,500,000This was the steal of the offseason in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugo said:

Zach Kerr is. He currently sits as the 12th best IDL in the league according to PFF, and he has been a massive disruptor on that D-line. He also seems to be a great locker room guy. The craziest part is that we sign him to a 2 years, $3,000,000 contract with an average annual salary of $1,500,000This was the steal of the offseason in my opinion. 

Dollar to dollar, abso-frikkin-lutely! That's 1 hell of a bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Kerr's probably a short term guy, similar to Kyle Love.

But I agree, he's been good.

Made that comparison myself--prolly where you stole it!  (kidding) Love stayed here about what, 4 seasons?  Kept getting those 1-year deals.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guarantee certain posters are scouring the internet to try and find some loose connection between Kerr and Rhule to avoid giving even a morsel of credit to Hurney for this signing lol.

"Well you see, Kerr's second cousin's neighbor actually was a freshman during Rhule's last year coaching at Temple and took a sports psychology course, so he MUST have ran into Rhule at some point and told him how great of a football player Kerr was".

man keyboard GIF by South Park

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I guarantee certain posters are scouring the internet to try and find some loose connection between Kerr and Rhule to avoid giving even a morsel of credit to Hurney for this signing lol.

"Well you see, Kerr's second cousin's neighbor actually was a freshman during Rhule's last year coaching at Temple and took a sports psychology course, so he MUST have ran into Rhule at some point and told him how great of a football player Kerr was".

man keyboard GIF by South Park

I get pretty tired of the Hurney vs. the coaching staff nonsense. That is a 50/50 blame and 50/50 credit, IMO. We don't actually have any idea what percentage that each specific player was which person's idea. This is the same all the time and at every franchise. The only surefire blame is the coach/GM scenario. Those guys are always 100% to blame and get 100% credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I get pretty tired of the Hurney vs. the coaching staff nonsense. That is a 50/50 blame and 50/50 credit, IMO. We don't actually have any idea what percentage that each specific player was which person's idea. This is the same all the time and at every franchise. The only surefire blame is the coach/GM scenario. Those guys are always 100% to blame and get 100% credit.

True, roster building (draft, FA, etc.) is always a synergistic, collaborative effort between head coach and GM.  People who espouse claims like "Thank GOD we handed drafting duties over to Rhule and co. this year" are clearly driven by an agenda.  Then these same people in another thread are arguing about how dumb Hurney was to sign Teddy this offseason...like, huh?  At least try to be consistent.

So far the Hurney/Rhule experiment seems to be a lot more promising than Hurney/Rivera and Hurney/Fox, at least as far as roster talent.  Way too early to tell, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...