Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Salary Cap might not go down


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Per Florio, citing "a league source" the NFL is saying that if (IF) there is a likelihood that stadiums will be fully open in 2021, they might hold off on reducing the Salary Cap.

That'd obviously have implications for free agency.

It's only a discussion at the moment though, so more to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Per Florio, citing "a league source" the NFL is saying that if (IF) there is a likelihood that stadiums will be fully open in 2021, they might hold off on reducing the Salary Cap.

That'd obviously have implications for free agency.

It's only a discussion at the moment though, so more to come.

I sincerely hope it does drop because we have the room to navigate and be okay. The Saints however.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you could actually REDUCE the salary cap in the first place.  Sure, you could keep it the same, but reducing it would be very unfair to some teams.  I know we aren't one of them, because our cap is finally looking healthy again for next season, but the fact remains that it wouldn't be competitively fair to reduce it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s no logical reason to let Moton walk. I don’t care what you think about Hurney. Rhule will be deciding whether we keep Moton or not. He’s not gone until he’s gone so I don’t really care about him not being signed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ship said:

There’s no logical reason to let Moton walk. I don’t care what you think about Hurney. Rhule will be deciding whether we keep Moton or not. He’s not gone until he’s gone so I don’t really care about him not being signed yet.

What makes you think logic has any part in Panthers free agency?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I'm not sure how you could actually REDUCE the salary cap in the first place.  Sure, you could keep it the same, but reducing it would be very unfair to some teams.  I know we aren't one of them, because our cap is finally looking healthy again for next season, but the fact remains that it wouldn't be competitively fair to reduce it.

Personally, I'd love to see it reduced and I think it would be fair, if applied across all teams (which it would be). I think there have been teams that have been kicking cans down the road to keep rosters loaded and it's time it caught up with them. New Orleans, Dallas, you know, the regular culprits and teams I'd love to hear squeal for a few years.

It would actually be a really good move to make competitiveness more paramount and to restore some parity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I'm not sure how you could actually REDUCE the salary cap in the first place.  Sure, you could keep it the same, but reducing it would be very unfair to some teams.  I know we aren't one of them, because our cap is finally looking healthy again for next season, but the fact remains that it wouldn't be competitively fair to reduce it.

The league has already negotiated a deal with the NFLPA to spread the hit out over three seasons and have an absolute floor of $175 mil. It's not really about fairness. There isn't much fair about the things that have happened during the pandemic. It just sort of is what it is. The NFL owners are definitely not going to agree to just operate in the red out of a sense of "fairness." They care about money overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Personally, I'd love to see it reduced and I think it would be fair, if applied across all teams (which it would be). I think there have been teams that have been kicking cans down the road to keep rosters loaded and it's time it caught up with them. New Orleans, Dallas, you know, the regular culprits and teams I'd love to hear squeal for a few years.

It would actually be a really good move to make competitiveness more paramount and to restore some parity.

See what I mean?  It's punitive, targeted at a few teams whom it would hurt unfairly more than others.

I don't disagree that teams have been kicking a can down the road, but that's their right.  They did it based on the knowledge in the labor agreement that the salary cap would continue to grow.  I also think it will catch up to them eventually and I look forward to that day.  But both of us could be wrong!  Using a global crisis to accelerate or trigger it would be grossly unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually I have always felt that using a qb to sneak was a huge mistake even for big guys. Do you remember when Cam sneaked the ball and got a helmet spear to the head and it wasn't even called. It is unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Everyone knows what you are going to do. Why not have a big guy or backup run the ball who is disposable? Yeah they know what is coming if you bring in a big guy. Like they don't if you keep the QB in...... Actually there are many more reasons not to sneak the ball with the qb versus using something else like New Orleans did who could still run or pass.
    • you want me to provide evidence of his jump balls? Or bailing the pocket?  I don't think either of those claims requires me to show you evidence.  What do you want evidence of exactly?  never did I mention downfield throws.  I said, he gets blind to play at the lines because of his size (the quick stuff).  There are literally plays I don't have time to search for but have been highlighted on QB school where there is just no way he can see the options on certain plays even if wide open (talking behind and around the line of scrimmage).   Line too close paired with the receiving  option too close.  And the stat I referenced (which you can find on next gen stats) was he is below average at and behind the line of scrimmage....which I'm sure his size/vision plays a role in the why. I have an agenda? Cool.  Then so do you.  and again, Bryce's cherry picked best play (which isn't how anything works).....still leaves him on the low end of production.  I'm not overly bashing Bryce.  I just acknowledge, most signs point to him having a low ceiling.  And in the big picture, that's not the direction you want to go.  He is our QB for now.  I hope he improves.  Which in turn would allow our O and others to develop.   But to me, there isn't much of an argument that Bryce Young is anything but short term solution.   
    • Again where is the evidence. You keep saying it but honestly you have shown no evidence. Unless you know what he was supposed to do and then what he did do, you don't know anything about his intentions and or forced changes due to height. His completion percentage for passes from 1 to 10 yards was only slightly lower than his best percentage which was 10 to 20 yards passing.  Not enough of a difference to be significantly different.  Truth is you have an agenda that you try to justify despite any evidence to the contrary. Many of us felt the same way but have allowed his actual play to inform our opinion. I still would have picked Stroud over Bryce but I am willing to keep an open mind and see what is there instead of filtering everything through my biases and already polarized opinions.
×
×
  • Create New...