Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Year, another stretch where Sean Payton is undefeated without Brees


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

As of today Sean is 8-0 without Brees the last two years. Almost like he has a very QB friendly system with an excellent roster or something. Did Hurney get bamboozled YET AGAIN?

How do you figure Hurney got bamboozled? He did not make the call to bring in Bridgewater, that was Rhule and Brady.

Hurney is not in charge of anything anymore, he just has a title. Just look at our most recent draft for proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The job Payton has done without Brees and the job Belichick has done without Brady along with the roster he has left should get some attention.

People were quick to jump on crowning a Brady earlier in the season as the reason for the Pats success.  Now, the Pats are 6-6 without their big names, and Arians and the Bucs are 7-5 with a "Pats South."  They finish with four very winnable games (Vikings, Lions, and Falcons twice) and Arians better hope they win at least three of them, or people might just start thinking he is not such a genius, after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The job Payton has done without Brees and the job Belichick has done without Brady along with the roster he has left should get some attention.

People were quick to jump on crowning a Brady earlier in the season as the reason for the Pats success.  Now, the Pats are 6-6 without their big names, and Arians and the Bucs are 7-5 with a "Pats South."  They finish with four very winnable games (Vikings, Lions, and Falcons twice) and Arians better hope they win at least three of them, or people might just start thinking he is not such a genius, after all.

I think the Arians "genius" talk subsided quite some time ago. Not that he probably doesn't consider himself a genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

As of today Sean is 8-0 without Brees the last two years. Almost like he has a very QB friendly system with an excellent roster or something. Did Hurney get bamboozled YET AGAIN?

Could be a very friendly arguably best oline in football....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Proves that you can win and not have to sell your extremities to go out and get a franchise QB. Just my opinion.

In the short-term sure, but does it work long-term? Plenty of examples of backup QBs coming in and having short-term success. Our own Kyle Allen being one of them. The more film NFL teams get on you to study the harder it is to be successful. They pick you apart, learn your tendencies, learn your strengths and weaknesses then they adapt to exploit your tendencies while taking away your strengths and forcing you toward your weaknesses. That's when you find out how good a guy really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree, but I've already said that the players will definitely take more money up front because it's more security. But they want more guaranteed money and NFL FOs don't want to do that for several and various reasons, and that's what's at issue.  https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-second-round-rookies-finally-starting-to-sign-what-took-so-long-and-what-it-means-for-future-contracts/ It's a tug of war between teams and players, and, sure, paying a player a signing bonus may satisfy them, especially if--and sometimes "only if"--it ultimately leads to a guarantee of more of their contract, but the teams are on the hook for all of those guarantees when cap time comes, so if they guarantee more money, they're ultimately losing the contract game.
    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
×
×
  • Create New...