Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS early mock. Just a fun conjecture this Tuesday


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

As I have said before. I just want someone behind Teddington so I can quit worrying the coaching staff actually thinks he can be the franchise QB. As long as that doesn’t happen I will be worried he will be here after 3 years. 
I like Walker but he isn’t an NFL starter. Once teams get film on him he’ll struggle, like Kyle Allen, who has a better arm than Teddy. 
I hope they get their QB this offseason because if not I may be done with the Panthers for a while. 
Hard to support a team when I can’t stand the guy under center. If it wasn’t for Teddy I probably wouldn’t have any problem with them winning a few games down the stretch. But every win lowers our draft stock and makes Bathwater potentially remaining here that much closer. 
Because let’s face it. If we don’t get a QB this draft we will likely not get one in 2022 or 2023 unless we pay big and move up in the draft. 
Of course we could still have things go badly for us and be devastated by injuries and go 2-14 next year. Kinda like the 49ers. Who knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Fields, Lance, Wilson. Honestly, I don't care. I just hope the one we like best is available for us.

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

And that's the worry. People just want a QB because they don't think Bridgewater is the guy.

There's no way Lawrence, Fields, Lance and Wilson all pan out. It just doesn't happen that way in the NFL.

Lawrence is off the board for us. Fields probably is too - but he's also only started for a season and a half, which is a worry.

So you're left looking at Lance, who terrifies me as he's dominated an awful level of football for a single year - he's a massive project that ideally you take in the third round based on measurables. Then Wilson, who I need to see more of, but I'm less enthused than I used to be. 

Then you throw in Jones who's getting first round hype and Trask who should probably win the Heisman at this point.

Six first round QBs? Mental. 

Teddy isn't the answer, but I don't want any QB. Read what I wrote carefully without your previous bias altering your comprehension of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

A MSU fan myself. Mullins really can develop a qb. Hail State!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yaboychris28 said:

By why not Kyle Trask?

A- plays better competition 

B- has better stats than Joe Burrow at this point 

C- not an unknown small school player. 

There's serious questions about how well his traits transfer to the NFL. In the Florida games I've watched, there have been a receivers winning a bunch of 50/50 balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Probably fundamentals. Watch his throwing motion.. something about it is weird to me. Dan has a great track record with QBs though (Dak, Alex Smith, etc.) but remember The Golden Calf of Bristol as well. Phenomenal college QB, bad NFL QB. I'm a MSU alum so I watched him take 2 star Nick Fitzgerald and get him on Heisman watch lists

Motion reminds me of a mix between Wentz and Andrew Luck. It's a bit of a long windup like Wentz, but the second half of the throw looks like when Luck would throw.

I don't know what to think about him. I think Wilson is more accurate with a stronger arm and better mobility, but I think Trask could run our offense well. He does a lot of quick hits and reads to his receivers but airs it out every once in a while each game. From what limited film I have seen, his receivers (Specifically Pitts) are better at receiver than he is at placing the ball. He throws quite a few 50/50 balls up for grabs for his receivers to get, not a ton of hitting guys in stride. 

I'll look into him more at a later time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...