Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule “We have to move to get younger offensively in the draft” AKA O line will be a focus


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

I watched Matt Rhule’s season ending press conference today and a few things stood out to me:

He mentioned multiple times that he wants tough, hard nosed football players who can fight throughout the season even when nicked up (he mentioned specifically the QB position and how you must fight through the wear and tear of a season to play your best football in December, and how Teddy hasn’t played a full season in some time, and how he hasn't played his best football).

He also mentioned how this past offseason we focused on getting younger on defense through the draft, and how he wanted to get younger on offense in this years upcoming draft.

Looking at our roster we are young everywhere on offense other than the offensive line...so with that being said I fully expect us to go O line heavy during the draft, and for us to let Okung hit the market as he rightfully should (going back to Rhules comments about fighting to play and being there for the team when you are nicked up). On a side note, Taylor Moton was the opposite of Mr. Bitcoin, and played every single snap this season without missing any time for injury. 

3B3B9E24-6950-4B19-92ED-21D6E71CD2C9.jpeg

C72402C5-D1E4-4EEC-927B-2D37AC597C0B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, my first reaction when I heard him say this: "We need to be younger on offense?" :thinking:

But the OL is the one place it makes sense.

It made me specially think of two players (Okung and Paradis). After his toughness comment that immediately made me think of it being directed to Okung. I wonder if we finally draft another center as well, being that Paradis is on his final year and on the wrong side of 30. One thing for certain is that Rhule does not seem to be nearly as high on vets as Rivera and the Hurn dog was. I bet Hurney would be looking to extend Paradis this offseason to be one less hole to fill, but I get the impression Rhule prefers younger cheaper players to develop 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

QB is also apart of this equation.  So I hope we address every non skilled position and QB.  Our weapons are good.  Our protection is not. 

Absolutely. I feel like QB and O line will be #1 and #2 priorities of the offseason/draft. From Rhule today:

Rhule was frank, acknowledging that Bridgewater "hasn't played his best ball" the last month. Rhule mentioned the knee injury that happened in the second half of the second Tampa Bay game (though Bridgewater hasn't been on the injury report since Week 12), but also emphasized the need for improvements beyond the one guy.
 

Teddy has to have a tremendous offseason," Rhule said. "It's been a long time since he's played an entire year. And part of being a quarterback in this league is being able to withstand the physical toll of the season, and playing your best football at the end of the year. I don't know that I've seen that from him, so my encouragement for him has been to have a great offseason.

"In regards to draft and players and all those things, we'll look at every opportunity to have the best we can have at every position, and that includes quarterback."

That's a long way of saying, "Ask me later," though many are already making the connection between a top-10 pick and the inevitability of a young and pedigreed quarterback joining Bridgewater here.

B1B65E68-B510-44DA-84CB-FDAFC94767B8.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Moton closely a lot this year in comparison to the other olineman

reminded me of that giant, freak, athletic kid with the full beard that played 6 positions on your middle school football team

except he isn’t a freak, the oline is just utter garbage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, onmyown said:

I watched Moton closely a lot this year in comparison to the other olineman

reminded me of that giant, freak, athletic kid with the full beard that played 6 positions on your middle school football team

except he isn’t a freak, the oline is just utter garbage

It’s crazy we have to replace 4 starters on the line and not re signing him will be a devastating blow. This isn’t even including depth on the line,  so we are going to have to be busy in FA and the draft finding O line talent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

It’s crazy we have to replace 4 starters on the line and not re signing him will be a devastating blow. This isn’t even including depth on the line,  so we are going to have to be busy in FA and the draft finding O line talent

Actually, if you consider who our GM has been the last few years, it's not crazy at all...it's pretty normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I watched Matt Rhule’s season ending press conference today and a few things stood out to me:

He mentioned multiple times that he wants tough, hard nosed football players who can fight throughout the season even when nicked up (he mentioned specifically the QB position and how you must fight through the wear and tear of a season to play your best football in December, and how Teddy hasn’t played a full season in some time, and how he hasn't played his best football).

He also mentioned how this past offseason we focused on getting younger on defense through the draft, and how he wanted to get younger on offense in this years upcoming draft.

Looking at our roster we are young everywhere on offense other than the offensive line...so with that being said I fully expect us to go O line heavy during the draft, and for us to let Okung hit the market as he rightfully should (going back to Rhules comments about fighting to play and being there for the team when you are nicked up). On a side note, Taylor Moton was the opposite of Mr. Bitcoin, and played every single snap this season without missing any time for injury. 

3B3B9E24-6950-4B19-92ED-21D6E71CD2C9.jpeg

C72402C5-D1E4-4EEC-927B-2D37AC597C0B.jpeg

OFFENSIVE snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...