Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mac Jones


1989

Recommended Posts

People are getting far too wrapped up in the numbers and success and not looking critically.  In that game last night, he only made one or two throws that really showed (or required) any sort of arm strength.

What he did well last night:

  • Showed *exceptional* touch.  His passes were incredibly catchable balls in nearly every case.
  • Showed very good ability to work through progressions and find a guy.
  • Made easy throws look easy.  Don't under-value this ability.
  • Showed pretty good awareness in the pocket and ability to keep his eyes downfield.

What worked against him:

  • When he found the open man, that man was SOOOOOO open his ability to fit a ball in a tight space was never challenged.
  • His line did very well most of the night giving him time to move through all his reads.  He had FOREVER to make decisions.

The questions that I haven't seen him answer:

  • Can he fit a ball in a tight windows consistently?  He had one REALLY nice throw last night.  I'd like to see that more, since the NFL will demand it.
  • Can he make FAST decisions.  He clearly understands the game and his offense.  Can he do it when he doesn't have all day?

I wouldn't be mad if we drafted him, though I still question whether he is first round talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mac is also a product of a great system. I see the Pats taking him late 1st round. He's a Brady clone. Smart and accurate and plays great in a system. I also think he would be good for us as we are trying to build a system, not like have a Cam and build around the QB. I'm not sure if he's worth the 8th pick but mid to late 1st round I would. Sit a year under Teddy. Maybe moving back picks up an extra 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mac has an NFL OL, NFL WRs, and an NFL RB.  Now, he could have become the weakest link, but he stepped up.  Is he a first rounder?  No, but will he go in the first round this draft?

12-15 teams will be going after a starting QB this year.  I think he will go in the late first round--Indy, NE, Pittsburgh, for example.  Something tells me that all of these teams will be seeking a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's probably ideally suited for a West Coast system (which yes, we run).

I don't know that he'll ever be more than a half decent game manager though. Yes, you can win championships with that kind of quarterback, but you have to build exceptionally well around them.

And that's the thing: The problem with quarterbacks from dominant programs is that all too often, the talent around them is so head and shoulders above everybody else that they wind up looking better than they really are. Then once they hit the NFL where it's more of a level playing field, they get exposed.

I will say the lack of athleticism or arm strength doesn't really bother me because plenty of the NFL's best quarterbacks haven't been athletic specimens. At the pro level, that kind of thing is overrated. It's good to have, but not necessary.

Bottom Line: I mean, maybe he's another Joe Montana and nobody knows it yet (nobody knew it with Montana either) but I wouldn't bet on it. I'd say it's more likely he's another Brad Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Name an Alabama QB that turned out to be good...WRs won’t be that open in the NFL. Tua might eventually be good, but don’t forget people thought he was gods gift. 
 

Trey Lance is the best QB in this draft not named Trevor. 

Ace, it is so hard to gauge him, but you could be right---and in my heart of hearts, when I am drafting in my mocks with the intense pressure that coincides with mocking, that is the realistic QB I take.  I feel nervous about Fields, I feel better about Wilson but a little like I am drafting Clausen, and I think I am taking a system QB in Mac, he seems to be the quintessential NFL career backup.  But I remind myself--if Jones is a good QB because he is on a dominant team, Lance is too.  So then I look at skill sets--release, reading, feet, etc. and I cannot throw Lance in the "B" pile like I thought I could.  He checks all the boxes.

A good thread recently was based on an article (someone posted it here) that there are no QB universities like their used to be---in fact, if you look at starting QBs over the past few years, NC State might be #1.  So who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB on the best team in the country, with the best players at the skill and OL with a great running game, he has an average arm, & limited athleticism. 

He's a day two QB, don't fool yourselves gents. 

Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance those are the four first rounders. Trask, and the afformentioned might see early success if they go to a team towards the end of a round simply because those teams are better. But he's not an impact player / difference maker on a bad team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

QB on the best team in the country, with the best players at the skill and OL with a great running game, he has an average arm, & limited athleticism. 

He's a day two QB, don't fool yourselves gents. 

Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Lance those are the four first rounders. Trask, and the afformentioned might see early success if they go to a team towards the end of a round simply because those teams are better. But he's not an impact player / difference maker on a bad team. 

If Jones is being criticized for his supporting cast then lance is undraftable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rumors are the team is in fact done with Ikem. So it was going to be a LT, just depended on which one got to them at 19. 
    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
×
×
  • Create New...