Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson not the only big name vet at QB that we're looking at?

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Verge said:

People should definitely get it out of their minds that CMC wouldn't be potentially involved in the trade for Watson. Everything is on the table right now.

He won't be involved because nobody but Hurney would give CMC a contract like he has.  He's great but that contract makes him virtually untradable to any sane GM.  But stranger things have happened.  We would still be in the hook for the bonus money.  I just don't see any reasonable way you can pull it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, BigCat#1 said:

I'll take anything over teddy

Which is this forums biggest problem. It’s not about last year or even this coming year, it’s the bigger picture.

Need to draft the next franchise QB and have patience.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, joemac said:

Now thats interesting.  I would be totally fine with Stafford and the weapons we have on offense.  He could put up video game numbers in our system.

Would likely be a whole helluva lot cheaper than Watson as wel.

This. I don’t think we need a Watson caliber player to compete for a Lombardi with the weapons we have as long as we protect the QB and don’t become anemic on defense. This move makes a lot of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Here would be my ideal power ranking of the options

1: Teddy, 8th this year, future first, and CMC for Watson 

2: Trade up to 2nd overall with #8, future first, and second this year. Draft Wilson

3: Trade a second rounder for Stafford 

Everyone keeps offering too little.  Jamal Adams went for two 1st, a safety.  Go look at the RG3 trade or the Mack trade.

Watson -  more like three 1st and a good player such as CMC or Burns, maybe a 2nd also or another player

2nd pick - Probably our next three 1st, RG3 was three 1st and and a 2nd.

Stafford - depending on where the team is picking, possible a 1st

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Verge said:

People should definitely get it out of their minds that CMC wouldn't be potentially involved in the trade for Watson. Everything is on the table right now.

And that is dumb as hell, just like when u thought Little should have been a first round pick for the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Everyone keeps offering too little.  Jamal Adams went for two 1st, a safety.  Go look at the RG3 trade or the Mack trade.

Watson -  more like three 1st and a good player such as CMC or Burns, maybe a 2nd also or another player

2nd pick - Probably our next three 1st, RG3 was three 1st and and a 2nd.

Stafford - depending on where the team is picking, possible a 1st

 

Remember that Watson can tank his trade value with that no trade clause. It isn't a "free market" trade scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      Who is going to take a shot at Malik Willis

      By cranky · Posted

      So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • cranky
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By cranky · Posted

      Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
    • frankw
      PFF Best Deep Ball Thrower Award

      By frankw · Posted

      At the end of the day we're all holding our breath in anticipation waiting to see if Bryce Young will look and play horribly to begin his fourth season just as he has in his first three seasons. No cherry picking obscure metrics or screaming about haters will change that.
×
×
  • Create New...