Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL execs: it’s going to take 3 first rounders at least for DeShaun Watson.


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

How the fug are you going to rebuild once you're cap strapped to his contract and trade all your picks away ? It's likely going to take even more than 3 firsts 

You figure it the fug out because it's your job and you have a top three QB in the NFL

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scott12345 said:

it would be totally stupid

It would be very smart to do it. Because QB's dont grow on trees. For a top 10 QB? Absolutely not. For a top 3 QB? Yes, you do it. And twice on Sunday's. This is a QB driven league. You don't have a QB, you're not winning poo. Hence the predictable ass matchups we have on Sunday. Brady vs Rodger. Allen vs Mahomes (if he's healthy). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Everyone's acting like we're inserting Watson in a KC roster like Mahomes . In reality were still rebuilding the Oline and the defense . 

Three first rounders is an awful lot to give up for a rebuilding team.

If we were a more established team, maybe. But when you're rebuilding, giving up one of the best tools you have for completing that task isn't a great idea.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Three first rounders is an awful lot to give up for a rebuilding team.

If we were a more established team, maybe. But when you're rebuilding, giving up one of the best tools you have for completing that task isn't a great idea.

People need to factor in the cap cost also.  Lets assume its takes 3 1st and CMC.

The real question is:

Watson or Rookie QB (whoever you draft at 8 ) + 2 future 1st round picks + CMC + $100m in cap space over 5 years.

$100m is roughly the difference in cap cost between Watson for 5 years and anyone we pick.  $100m will help a lot in filling out a roster.

Even if you are wrong about the QB this year you still have 2 more 1st to use on future QBs.

A franchise QB on a rookie deal is easily the best deal in all of the NFL.  Drafting a QB is risky, but if you give up that much for an established QB you are reducing your margin of error on what draft picks you do have and also putting a lot of pressure on any free agent dollars you spend because they will be limited.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Three first rounders is an awful lot to give up for a rebuilding team.

If we were a more established team, maybe. But when you're rebuilding, giving up one of the best tools you have for completing that task isn't a great idea.

The reality is that winning consistently and winning superbowls without a elite qb is difficult to do.  And drafting one is hit and miss, and tends to be more miss than hit.  Watson is the closest thing to a sure thing.  

And in truth, I don't think we are as far away as some do.    We weren't that far away this year.  Pick up a good corner and a couple of decent to good olineman in the next two drafts, and we could put ourselves in very good position.

Granted, its  a difficult decision to make though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The reality is that winning consistently and winning superbowls without a elite qb is difficult to do.  And drafting one is hit and miss, and tends to be more miss than hit.  Watson is the closest thing to a sure thing.  

And in truth, I don't think we are as far away as some do.    We weren't that far away this year.  Pick up a good corner and a couple of decent to good olineman in the next two drafts, and we could put ourselves in very good position.

Granted, its  a difficult decision to make though.  

I definitely don't see us as just a quarterback and a couple of good players away.

We spent years complaining because despite the fact we had Cam Newton, he didn't have a good enough team around him. I'm not a fan of seeing us go back into that position.

(and I don't really think Watson would be either)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are rolling with the idea that we are drafting a QB in the 1st round this year anyway, then really its only 2 1st round picks and a rookie contract we're trading away.  That is definitely a fair deal for Deshaun Watson, even for a team rebuilding.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Umm yeah. When did he get it done at the right time? I seem to remember a 4-6 finish and needing Atlanta to win our way into the playoffs but whatever.   
    • I mean....no lies detected. See above. We have traded a fortune to draft a guy #1 overall that people have lowered standards for to the point that not playing like Jimmy Clausen and looking like a poor man's Kyle Allen occasionally is worthy of a contract extension making him one of the highest paid QB's in the league. That is cope on steroids.
    • summary: "let's talk about your draft, what did you think about Freeling" Dan:   guys with a huge upside, can come in and compete to start.  High ceiling "he does what for your offense?" Dan:   it's hard to find left tackles, guys that big and athletic.  We have Icky coming off an injury, we signed Walker, I believe your offensive line can never be too strong.  If we're going to win the game, it's gotta be up front on both sides of the ball, so we make a point of emphasis on making both sides of the front as strong as possible. "how many mocks did you see Monro falling to you." Not many times, left tackles are gonna go a lot earlier than when we took him.  We want to add the best player, in free agency or the draft"  that's our philosophy, to get the best players possible. "Hunter and Brazzell." Dan:  we followed the board.  Lee we felt very highly of him , super strong.  Brazzel so flexible and loose, can open the verticle.  Will Lee we held in high regard. "you take a look at your receiver room, Coker, my goodness, your offensive rookie of the year in Tet.  Lost Rico, but there is Jonathan Brooks. " Brooks coming off two knee injuries, he worked his way back, looking great, fully healthy, will help in pass and run game.  Icky, not sure when he's coming back but we're excited about both "plan on extending Bryce" we'll keep talking, will keep internally.  We believe in him, has such a great grasp of Canales and offense, has improved every year. "he's clearly come back from the benching, the arrow is trending up, where does he feel" Bryce knows where we stand with him, when and if a deal gets done, he knows we feel great with him, we'll get something done at the right time. "if this a prove it situation?" everyone in the building has to prove it, has to earn it. Tmac was everything we wanted, his work ethic, he's so big and talented, but he puts the work in, and is a great teammate. "your level of expectation, the building's level of expectation for 2026 "our goal is to win the division every year, we know we have to earn it.  we have to put the work in every day, proving it on the practice field, and our  guys know that." "schedule" we haven't opened at home in 2 or 3 years.  We love prime time games, hope we get some "  
×
×
  • Create New...