Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bucs at Packers NFC Championship Gameday thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hoenheim said:

It's about to be a Buccaneers vs Bills Super Bowl and I'm not even mad 

If so, I'm 100% all in on the Bills getting some poetic justice on that pussy in TB. But I still think the Packers can pull this off (Arians is a massive choker, no reason to think he won't again in this 2nd half), and I think the Chiefs beat the Bills.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Rodgers still made a trash throw. Yeah, holding could've been called but it wasn't and the ball was thrown as if the DB was the WR.

CB hold him the whole way.  Kind of hard to run a rout and separate when someone holds you like that.  Plus he ran a slant which always creates separation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, Ja Rhule said:

CB hold him the whole way.  Kind of hard to run a rout and separate when someone holds you like that.  Plus he ran a slant which always creates separation.

The hold didn't impact the INT at all. If the ball had been thrown out in front where it should've been the hold would've been obvious. Since it wasn't and it was behind the receiver leaving him to have to try to fight his way through the DB the hold was only visible from the correct angle. Rodgers threw a trash ball that was easily picked. It should've been a non-issue because there was a hold, but the trash throw made the hold much less obvious than it would've been otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...