Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor circulating between a potential Panthers/Niners QB swap... Teddy B for Jimmy G


FeelTheBurns53
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Basbear said:

He can cut Jimmy with no dead cap, this is like the Tri Turner for Okung trade. We should have just cut Turner. Okung played about 7 full games in total(for 13.5 million), another reason for Teddy poor play should be noted. His contract is at sportac and only had a 7 million SB, its in the clear. I bet we would be sending picks(2-5) for Jimmy, if this is true.

This QB changing teams could be the biggest stories of the off-season.

 

Didn’t realize this about Jimmy G’s contract. You are probably right. He doesn’t see much of a drop off and expects to get some additional compensation from us. The Niners are probably looking to trade up and take their future QB in the draft. Watch them swap QBs with us plus additional picks, and then use our own picks to jump us in the draft and take a QB we were wanting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Actually we won that trade. When Okung played he was very good and we got out from under Turner's deal. 

Id rather had the 13.5 in cap space, even before Okung struggled to play 7 games. Even if you didnt use it, roll it over to this year. Turners contract ended up being like many others, terrible. I watched some of Hards knocks, he could cosplay as a melting grimace to the nines. Turner didnt play many games either, to me it was a lose lose trade for both parties. We should have just cut him and not pay Okung 13.5 to play 7 games while Teddy had to fear for his life(imo). 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Didn’t realize this about Jimmy G’s contract. You are probably right. He doesn’t see much of a drop off and expects to get some additional compensation from us. The Niners are probably looking to trade up and take their future QB in the draft. Watch them swap QBs with us plus additional picks, and then use our own picks to jump us in the draft and take a QB we were wanting....

People in this thread thinking 49ers will be sending the picks, LOL!!

 

  9ers must think he has value, pats rumors are all out there. A big issue is the reduced cap, team are not wanting to pay QBs these 30 mill salary when the cap is 180. So many teams are out there thinking they could find cheaper QBs. One team could start a frenzy of movement. My best guess is only about 10 QBs are "safe", that means 22 spots could be traded, cut, or drafted. One swap already happened, I forsee many more, but some maybe in order to clear room. Plus teams are hearing what some teams want, and moving on to different options...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This rumor has no credibility whatsoever, but it would be a homerun for the Panthers.  I don’t think some of you realize how much better Jimmy G is then Teddy.  Jimmy just hasent been healthy the last two seasons (which is troubling), but he is a significant upgrade imho.  
 

Jimmys super bowl season he had no weapons outside of Kittle (they had to acquire old ass Manny Sanders) and he was awesome.  With what we have here the sky’s the limit.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Doesn't make sense for either team. I can't say I believe this one at all.

For the 49ers they would be getting picks and a QB thats able to play 15/16 games and backup if needed.

 

Panthers would be able to get off paying Teddy 10 mill, no matter what. Thats his guarantees, along with another 8 million in base. 

They must not like the other options out there, I want them to stay put at 8 and hope theres a QB they like still available. Plus being in 5 deals, puts more control in your hands.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well that's part of where the disconnect is then, you think Chark was a "solid NFL player" I couldn't disagree more, he's someone who had one solid NFL season and then was at best a JAG the rest of his career, I wouldn't call that a "solid NFL player" If he was a #3 WR and put up the stats he did outside of that 1 season, then sure, he's a "solid NFL player" but he put up those numbers as the #1 WR in 3 of his 4 seasons that he had meaningful roles and the #2 in a high powered offense the 4th.   That's not good and not what I'd call a "solid NFL player"
    • Everything always makes sense in hindsight. Hell, I've seen guys who were touted by everyone as slam dunk "safest player in the draft" type prospects bust massively. Remember Aaron Curry? Robert Gallery? I'm just never going to say that a prospect is definitely a better NFL player than a solid NFL player. Better as a prospect? Sure, you can always make those arguments. But ultimately it comes down to what you do on Sundays and what you did on Saturdays just isn't relevant when you're talking about who's the better NFL player.
    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. Look at it this way, without even knowing what the rest of Chark's career turned out to be, would anyone seriously say they'd take Chark after the 2019 season over today's T-Mac if they somehow were in a draft and we were deciding between the two?  As even after that season, his potential was never what T-Mac's is right now. Even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
×
×
  • Create New...