Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Watson Update


Calboyz13
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Verge said:

I no longer believe Houston will be able to retain him. 

They might not, but I definitely believe they're going to give it their damndest.

Well, short of the obvious step of firing Jack Easterby.

(that they value him enough to keep him in the middle of all this mess is just insane to me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Knew you were 🙂

We've got some folks who absolutely don't want to hear anything other than that what they want is gonna happen. And hey, maybe it will, but taking it as a guarantee is setting yourself up for disappointment.

All u have said from the start is this trade wasn’t going to happen and if the least little chance it does it would not be here. But keep on keeping on!

Edited by BurnNChinn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

All u have said from the start is this trade wasn’t going to happen and if the least little chance he does it would not be here. But keep on keeping on!

I don't believe it will.

I do however acknowledge that it could.

That's not exactly a complicated position.

Here's the fun part though: I could spend all of my time saying "yes it's going to happen" and talking up even the slightest possibility whenever someone mentions anything.

Would you like to guess how much impact that would have on what ultimately does happen?

I'll give you a hint...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s no doubt either Deshaun gets either traded or sits out. There have been reports by national level insiders that have stated he won’t play for the Texans ever again. 
 

I wonder if this topic was brought up in any interviews during our GM search 🤔

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't believe it will.

I do however acknowledge that it could.

That's not exactly a complicated position.

Here's the fun part though: I could spend all of my time saying "yes it's going to happen" and talking up even the slightest possibility whenever someone mentions anything.

Would you like to guess how much impact that would have on what ultimately does happen?

I'll give you a hint...

So instead you literally spend all of your time trying to convince others it’s not going to happen? Guess how much impact that ultimately has on what happens?

At the end of the day, the Panthers are going to be aggressive. That much should’ve been made obvious to everyone when they were willing to part with their 1st rounder this year for Stafford. They will do everything in their power to land Watson BUT there are other teams with top 10 picks that can put together better packages than we can. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read through this whole thread, but I'm seeing quite a few posts in favor of trading CMC.  This surprises me.  Shoot for me, the whole appeal of Watson being here in this offense goes away without CMC being here also.  I know running backs are a dime a dozen, but dag, this is CMC we are talking about here.  This ain't no scrub.  We still haven't seen him at his best.

This is also kind of funny to me personally because before we gave CMC his contract a year ago or so, I wasn't against trading him for I believe draft picks.  Yet now that we paid him like a QB, I expect big results from this dude as a Panther.  

Edited by Matthias
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

So instead you literally spend all of your time trying to convince others it’s not going to happen? Guess how much impact that ultimately has on what happens?

At the end of the day, the Panthers are going to be aggressive. That much should’ve been made obvious to everyone when they were willing to part with their 1st rounder this year for Stafford. They will do everything in their power to land Watson BUT there are other teams with top 10 picks that can put together better packages than we can. 

Believe it or not, I don't actually view the football discussions I have on here as a mission with an objective.

It's literally just football talk.

If you take it a little more seriously than I do, well... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Matthias said:

I haven't read through this whole thread, but I'm seeing quite a few posts in favor of trading CMC.  This surprises me.  Shoot for me, the whole appeal of Watson being here in this offense goes away without CMC being here also.  I know running back are a dime a dozen, but dag, this is CMC we are talking about here.  This ain't no scrub.  We still haven't seen him at his best.

I'd prefer it be for three 1sts straight up, but all the talk has been that the Texans wants picks and a player(s). If that's the case, I'd rather it be CMC than someone like Burns simply due to positional value. I'd rather it be CMC than someone like Chinn simply due to the reality that Chinn still has three years left on a cheap rookie contract. I'd rather it be CMC than someone like Moore again due to positional value. What I will say though is that if CMC is part of the deal then IMO re-signing Samuel becomes borderline critical. Samuel filled in for CMC in a lot of ways last year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...