Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

La Canfora on Tepper's desire for Watson/franchise QB


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You're full of it, but you know that already. Preseason can't be equated to a regular season. Just stop!

Pal, a hold-out is a hold-out...

...Bell was dumb enough to hold out twice and ownership didn't "fold" either time. 

Do you really believe Deshaun is dumb enough to put multi-million dollar game checks at risk by holding out?

Show us one NFL QB who has ever done so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigAggieLean. said:

Yea, I’ve got no problem giving up the 3 firsts. That ain’t no thing. Honestly, I could be talked into giving up a 4th. I want this years 2nd, though. I would like to keep the 2nds for the next 3 years. I feel this regime will be much better in the later rounds.

I am not willing to give up that much draft capital. I love Watson but we can't be a team that has to wait until his second mega-deal to compete. Trading away that many first round draft picks(plus more, I am sure) is not the way to do it. 

We just aren't the team that can afford that price. Maybe in 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes sense why he would want a star qb. 
 

We are a completely irrelevant franchise without one. 
 

Hell, we were mostly an irrelevant franchise when we had an MVP playing qb for us. 
 

The entire organization needs a facelift and it starts with putting a winning product on the field. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Pal, a hold-out is a hold-out...

...Bell was dumb enough to hold out twice and ownership didn't "fold" either time. 

Do you really believe Deshaun is dumb enough to put multi-million dollar game checks at risk by holding out?

Show us one NFL QB who has ever done so....

Do you think it matters the reason for sitting out? Bell sat out for money, Watson is sitting out bc issues with upper management. I can’t remember, did Bell request a trade? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Do you think it matters the reason for sitting out?

...Watson is sitting out bc issues with upper management.

Yes.

Watson has not sat-out a single day...nor do I expect he will.

Hurt feelings are no reason to take a pass on $146,540,000.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Haha not decades, but maybe a decade. 

It's going to take us 5 years just to get back to the playoffs right now and that's just with poor drafting. Zero first round picks for 4 years would be triple that at the best. 

Edited by Snake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Oh only $110,000,000 huh...gotcha.

Luck had already banked $110,000,000 when he retired...LOL.

If you're correct and Watson does walk away from the game and retire, will be interesting to watch --- what kind of odds are you placing on that exact scenario playing out?

well, I think you are missing the point.  There are different degrees of fug you money.  But Watson already has real fug you money from football and endorsements.   He isn't a random average player the league can push around. 

I never said I think Watson walks away from football and retires.  I think Watson is willing to be that dude who brings this to the NFL and will sit a season to flex.   Just as owners are looking at Hou ownership, players are looking at Watson. 

I do not think he plays football for Houston this season (pending the FO isn't cleaned up).  I'd put that at over 50% and therefore the most likely aspect.  How him not playing for Hou this season under current leadership is constructed plays out? Well, that could go lots of ways.  Sits.  Traded.  Either could happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's going to take us 5 years just to get back to the playoffs right now and that's just with poor drafting. Zero first round picks for 4 years would be triple that at the best. 

why would it triple it? The average contract of a 1st round pick is 4.33 years. It's extremely rare that a player plays for a franchise for a decade. It's also not as common for a 1st round pick to resign with their team after the first contract (56%). A team losing four first round picks, wouldnt set them back decades

I mean if you look at the patriots during their dynasty run, what did their first round picks really do for the franchise?  Yet they won 4 SBs regardless of their drafting.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

why would it triple it? The average contract of a 1st round pick is 4.33 years. It's extremely rare that a player plays for a franchise for a decade. It's also not as common for a 1st round pick to resign with their team after the first contract (56%). A team losing four first round picks, wouldnt set them back decades

I mean if you look at the patriots during their dynasty run, what did their first round picks really do for the franchise?  Yet they won 4 SBs regardless of their drafting.

Meme Reaction GIF by Robert E Blackmon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...