Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possibly the craziest draft story you might read


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If there wasn't a Trevor Lawrence available Wilson would probably be the #1 overall pick, but teams aren't just looking at a player's ceiling they're also looking at the floor. IMO, Lawrence's floor is significantly higher. It's difficult to imagine Lawrence being a complete bust with his physical tools, consistency, and level of competition. Wilson has very intriguing physical tools, but he also has some injury history and hasn't played against top competition. It's a lot easier to envision Wilson being a bust than Lawrence and I say that as a guy who is high as a giraffe's ass on Wilson.

I can see the talent everyone else see but i just don’t think he is built to last in the nfl . But if kyler can do it he can . I just don’t know i don’t see it . He gotta get in the right system of course they all do but more so for him than others . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not advocating for this individual at all but how can Mac Jones get beat up on cause he plays with potential nfl players and that supposedly is the only reason he looks as good as he does but Lawrence doesn’t it ain’t like Trevor is playing with chopped liver at Clemson. 
they all have potential to bust or not 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cuttinedge said:

I’m not advocating for this individual at all but how can Mac Jones get beat up on cause he plays with potential nfl players and that supposedly is the only reason he looks as good as he does but Lawrence doesn’t it ain’t like Trevor is playing with chopped liver at Clemson. 
they all have potential to bust or not 🤷‍♂️

Take it a step further - why does no-one criticise Lance for playing on, what is essentially, a P5 team in the FCS?

Watch his tape - guys are running WIIIIIIIIIIIDE open all over the shop. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Take it a step further - why does no-one criticise Lance for playing on, what is essentially, a P5 team in the FCS?

Watch his tape - guys are running WIIIIIIIIIIIDE open all over the shop. 

I agree it’s  basically like he’s a grownup playing against his kids little league team. Watching some of his highlights of him running over 200 lb linebackers doesn’t enthuse me at all.
He tries that in the nfl and he’s out of the league faster than Johnny manziel. 

He has the greatest bust potential I think. He could turn out to be amazing but I think he’s at least 2years away.

He just haven’t played against competition like fields and Lawrence have.  
and the speed of the nfl game could have his head spinning for years if thrown into the fire too soon 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BrizzMachete said:

11 tds and 9 picks in the c-USA is playing at a high level since when ? He had only one good year and that was this year then came up small against the best competition he faced against costal . I’m not buying it just don’t see it . He got a nice arm tho 

If you re-watch the game, Wilson did not come up small, everyone else in BYU did. Wilson was throwing dimes his receivers were dropping, his line wasn't blocking, one of his receivers ran backwards 20 yards, his RB fumbled, and his defense couldn't keep Coastal's O off the field. 

Wilson marched the team down the field with less than a minute left, threw a strike on the best option on the last play and came up a yard short. Wilson looked fine all game. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

If you re-watch the game, Wilson did not come up small, everyone else in BYU did. Wilson was throwing dimes his receivers were dropping, his line wasn't blocking, one of his receivers ran backwards 20 yards, his RB fumbled, and his defense couldn't keep Coastal's O off the field. 

Wilson marched the team down the field with less than a minute left, threw a strike on the best option on the last play and came up a yard short. Wilson looked fine all game. 

If he is who they say he is then he came up small . Stop the excuses he ain’t do enough . Just like mahomes in the super bowl n Rodgers in the afc championship . When it’s time to step up , you gotta step up . It was plays to be made n they weren’t made . 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BrizzMachete said:

If he is who they say he is then he came up small . Stop the excuses he ain’t do enough . Just like mahomes in the super bowl n Rodgers in the afc championship . When it’s time to step up , you gotta step up . It was plays to be made n they weren’t made . 

He made the plays available though...

I mean your example of Mahomes coming up short in the Super Bowl is a terrible example too. Mahomes was doing everything he could, his supporting cast didn't do jack. Receivers couldn't catch after he scrambled for 20 yards behind a line anchored by Mike Remmers. Mahomes literally threw a dime parallel to the ground that hit a receiver in the head near the endzone. 

Seriously, go the watch BYU/Coastal game again. Game script didn't allow him to throw again until midway through the 4th quarter, due to poor defense and coaches wanting to eat up clock by running (and fumbling) and even then his receivers did him no favors dropping great passes and literally running backwards 15-20 yards on a play. Complete drive killers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Take it a step further - why does no-one criticise Lance for playing on, what is essentially, a P5 team in the FCS?

Watch his tape - guys are running WIIIIIIIIIIIDE open all over the shop. 

Because people are basing everything on wishful thinking. They aren't critically analyzing or being honest about any of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

Not the craziest thing I've heard or even close. Lawrence is surrounded by NFL players. It's possible he's slightly overrated given people assume he will be great.

People say this because he’s on Clemson’s roster and don’t actually look into his offensive personnel. 
 

This year on the offensive line he had one linemen who will be drafted this year. Also, MAYBE one more lineman who will be drafted in the NFL in the future. This is why Clemson lost like they did against Ohio State. Clemson Oline is straight garbage. This coming from a Clemson fan.

Clemson has absolutely no TE on offense. Definitely not going to the NFL.

Clemson also had two of its 5-star WRs injured all year. He had two WRs that will POSSIBLY be drafted. Amari Rodgers is a guarantee, but he’s probably a 3rd-5th rounder. Powell MIGHT get drafted. 
 

His best weapon was obviously ETN. 
 

Sure, he has some NFL talent around him, but not much. Especially when you compare him to who he had versus who Fields and Jones were surrounded by. Both Fields and Mac were surrounded by a ton of NFL weapons and lineman. 
 

Not saying Trevor didn’t have a decent supporting cast, but to insinuate that his greatness is because of his supporting cast is lazy. He did a lot more with a lot less versus a Fields and a Jones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BrizzMachete said:

11 tds and 9 picks in the c-USA is playing at a high level since when ? He had only one good year and that was this year then came up small against the best competition he faced against costal . I’m not buying it just don’t see it . He got a nice arm tho 

I didnt watch the CC game but looking at the stats of just one game is a tough way to judge a QB. If you just look at the stats from the Super Bowl you could say Mahomes choked in the biggest game. 0 TDs, 2 INTs and a 53 Rating. But he was under constant pressure and receivers were dropping balls. Im not advocating for or against Wilson just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...