Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King on Panthers and Deshaun Watson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Genuine question, what has Tua done that makes him more impressive than Jones?

People poo on Jones on here, yet think Tua's part of any Dolphins deal for Watson. 

I forget who, but there was an analyst not long ago making an argument that as far as his final college season vs Tua's, Jones was actually better.

Me? Don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I forget who, but there was an analyst not long ago making an argument that as far as his final college season vs Tua's, Jones was actually better.

Me? Don't know.

I mean you just need to have watched them play to see that Jones had a better final season in College. 

Tanking for Tua was dumb - and quite frankly I hope that they try to rectify that by trading for Watson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's already going to be difficult to re-sign Samuel. The cap hit involved with trading McCaffrey would make it damn near impossible.

Voth has pretty well established that McCaffrey is untradable so any speculation of a deal involving him isn't very realistic.

I think we could absolutely resign Curt as long as year one was team friendly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Genuine question, what has Tua done that makes him more impressive than Jones?

People poo on Jones on here, yet think Tua's part of any Dolphins deal for Watson. 

Nothing. I'm just saying they have Tua to offer and they have the #3 overall pick guaranteeing at worst the 3rd QB off the board this year. They simply have more and better options to offer than we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offer Shaq Thompson, Teddy Bridgewater and 3 first round picks. Don't offer something wild that will completely decimate us. We are the only NFC team (major plus) and are one of the only teams that Watson would agree to a trade. Think of it this way, would he agree to go to an already decimated Jets team after the fact that they trade away their entire future? Maybe, but I wouldn't come out way too aggressive if I am the Panthers, especially if Watson stays firm.

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

r/panthers - Uh... I want Watson as much as anyone else but that’s honestly too much 😂

This trade isn't as bad as it looks.  Yes, Anderson+Burns + 2 firsts is a lot, but that's probably at minimum what the Texans can fetch for a talent like Waston, and i'd rather movie Robbie than a third 1st rounder.  Moving CMC hurts because of his talent, but he is an RB that's getting paid -- never smart to do -- and most importantly is the price we pay to dump Two Yards in the process.  I'd pull the trigger in a second.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MVPccaffrey said:

This trade isn't as bad as it looks.  Yes, Anderson+Burns + 2 firsts is a lot, but that's probably at minimum what the Texans can fetch for a talent like Waston, and i'd rather movie Robbie than a third 1st rounder.  Moving CMC hurts because of his talent, but he is an RB that's getting paid -- never smart to do -- and most importantly is the price we pay to dump Two Yards in the process.  I'd pull the trigger in a second.

The differing opinions on this board make it a fun place to visit. Things are always lively here and most of the time we are all pretty civil to one another.

That said, I HATE this deal and would never consider it. Assuming Christian is healthy now, we'd be giving away 4 starters and two #1 picks in back to back years. Anderson was our leading receiver last year and when healthy Christian is arguably the most versatile back in the NFL. Teddy isn't great, but he can win games for you in this league. And, Burns is one of the best young pass rushers in the league. He had almost 1/3 of our sacks (9 out of a team total of 29). Sure, we'd have Watson, but outside of DJ, who is gonna throw it to? Who's gonna replace Burns sack total? Mike Davis is good, but is he who we want to build the running game around going forward?  

Those guys would have to be replaced. It wouldn't so be bad if we were so deep that the answers were already on the roster. Unfortunstely, they're not. It's a lot harder to replace them or address other roster needs w/out 1st round draft choices in back to back years. If they said 2 #1 picks and Teddy...that's hard to turn down. But, I'm not giving away the other starters for a QB , despite being good, has had two ACL surgeries before age 26.

 

 

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...