Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where's our cap going?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, BrianS said:

FWIW, our positional spending at QB is actually middle of the pack.  14th to be exact.

It may not be as difficult to unload Bridgewater as we thought.

I knew the percentage of cap going toward Bridgewater would tick people off, but to be fair a lot of people are ticked off that were paying him at all.

The bigger surprise to me though is Shaq taking up more cap than both Moton and McCaffrey.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Shaq but I’m never really wowed by anything he does. If I could get a pick and dump the contract, I’d be thinking about it really hard. 
 

Then Draft and actual MLB (I like Cameron McGrone) and draft an LB whose skills lean more toward coverage to replace Shaq. Those two will stay on the field and we can just plug an already rostered JAG in for SLB.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I knew the percentage of cap going toward Bridgewater would tick people off, but to be fair a lot of people are ticked off that were paying him at all.

The bigger surprise to me though is Shaq taking up more cap than both Moton and McCaffrey.

Shaq's contract, like all Marty Hurney contracts is an absolute disaster.

He's slated to be the 2nd highest paid ILB in the league next season...that includes actual MLB's.

What a disaster.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I knew the percentage of cap going toward Bridgewater would tick people off, but to be fair a lot of people are ticked off that were paying him at all.

The bigger surprise to me though is Shaq taking up more cap than both Moton and McCaffrey.

Shaq is a big hit this year, but this is probably the worst year in terms of his pay.  Overall, his contract was't that bad, and the savings if we cut him grow exponentially the next two years.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I knew the percentage of cap going toward Bridgewater would tick people off, but to be fair a lot of people are ticked off that were paying him at all.

The bigger surprise to me though is Shaq taking up more cap than both Moton and McCaffrey.

Shaq is definitely a problem.  He's an average to good LB being paid good to excellent money.

I'm not sure how we designated our current crop of cuts, but if we still have a post June 1 slot, we could really cut some cap there.  I don't think we do that however.  We just sit tight, bite our lip and pay it this year.  Prior to 2022, we will be in a much better position both for overall cap and to cut Shaq.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Shaq is definitely a problem.  He's an average to good LB being paid good to excellent money.

I'm not sure how we designated our current crop of cuts, but if we still have a post June 1 slot, we could really cut some cap there.  I don't think we do that however.  We just sit tight, bite our lip and pay it this year.  Prior to 2022, we will be in a much better position both for overall cap and to cut Shaq.

Boston is post June 1st, I think.

No one else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Shaq is a big hit this year, but this is probably the worst year in terms of his pay.  Overall, his contract was't that bad, and the savings if we cut him grow exponentially the next two years.  

I know you to be smart, so it really confuses me when you continue to be this wrong about something thats in black and white in front of your face.

Shaq carries a cap hit only second to Bobby Wagner.  That is flatly awful for an average player.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

I know you to be smart, so it really confuses me when you continue to be this wrong about something thats in black and white in front of your face.

Shaq carries a cap hit only second to Bobby Wagner.  That is flatly awful for an average player.

Yep. Long-term the contract isn't awful because we can get out of it, but in the short-term we're grossly overpaying a "good" player at a relatively non-premium position.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our cap situation could easily be much better with a few simple moves. 

I really don’t want to hear the excuse we don’t have the cap space this year. 

This could be a good year to sign guys who are looking for security versus one year deals so they can cash in next season. The cap will shoot back up next season so for the players choosing security, there will be value in signing them to long term deals.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...