Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: The Panthers are "locked on Watson"


MVPccaffrey
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Yeah hell no. Would rather lose CMC than both BB and Brown.

 

It's a hardball starting offer, that's how negotiations work.  We'll keep at least one of them, though I imagine one will go as part of the deal.

 

Get on board the Watson train or be left behind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MVPccaffrey said:

Ya'll thought the Penn State Panther fan traveling contingent was big during the Collins years, just wait until half the population of Death Valley shoots up 85N to support their favorite player ever on Sundays!

It’ll be the second biggest movement of white trash rednecks of the year!

(first being bicycle week at Myrtle obviously)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No. That's five 1st rounders. Can't do that.

Burns is worth 2 first rounders for sure. Brown worth a top 10 pick or more. So that’s 2 top 10 picks and 4 other first rounders. Can only laugh at that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Are they High? Watson is good, but he is not that good. Give them the 8th this year, a second and third next year, and a coupon to Bojangles. 

Tepper will give them whatever they want eventually, maybe after talking them down a pick and a player, but we will do it, a lot of fans will whine about it, but they'll pretend they were FOR it the whole time as we're winning the division year after year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's watch free agency to see if we are preparing for him---so far, I see OL depth--maybe a starting LG--but I am not happy with the picks, to be honest after a day of letting them sink in.

I guess that means Trubiski is out.

It does not mean drafting a QB is out. 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...