Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Why the fug would he come here? What is so inviting about this team to come here? Some good wide outs...sure. but shat Oline and probably years away to being SB quality with all the holes every place else. You all have high hopes.

Why do you not want him here? He's better than any possible qb we could get in the draft or free agency 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NJPanthers12 said:

Get ready to be mediocre if they get Watson. This roster is nothing short of awful. Trading 3 years worth of picks and having someone counting at $40m a year on the cap won’t make it easy to build up the roster. He’s a great QB, but there are way too many holes on this roster. Plus if you need to give up one of moore, brown, and chinn, you are only making it that much harder.

Yall will spin getting the covid vaccine, Lamelo and the QB2 in the league in the same month as a bad thing

Marty Hurney strikes again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

@Vergeany insights into who will be the young players in the deal?

I doubt Brian Burns or Derrick Brown will be traded if that is what you are looking for. If I had to guess look for Shaq Thompson, CMC, Jeremy Chinn, Robby Anderson, or Donte Jackson to be in the mix. We don't have a ton of insight on the exact details, but it will be more pick heavy than anything.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Get ready to be mediocre if they get Watson. This roster is nothing short of awful. Trading 3 years worth of picks and having someone counting at $40m a year on the cap won’t make it easy to build up the roster. He’s a great QB, but there are way too many holes on this roster. Plus if you need to give up one of moore, brown, and chinn, you are only making it that much harder.

The cap explodes to a projected 220 million in 2022. I’m not worried about his cap hits. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CanePantherHornet said:

I'm excited but just please don't let it be for too much

This is my biggest worry. The team is so awful aside from a few promising young players, mostly on defense. I really hope we don't give up 3 first round picks, Burns and Brown, and the defense is a dumpster fire and Watson is playing shootout ball like he did in Houston to a 4-12 record.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

I doubt Brian Burns or Derrick Brown will be traded if that is what you are looking for. If I had to guess look for Shaq Thompson, CMC, Jeremy Chinn, Robby Anderson, or Donte Jackson to be in the mix. We don't have a ton of insight on the exact details, but it will be more pick heavy than anything.

Less than a day ago they were posting Chinn on the mainsite. He's looking like a foundation moving forward. I'd switch him with YGM. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

Yall will spin getting the covid vaccine, Lamelo and the QB2 in the league in the same month as a bad thing

Marty Hurney strikes again

Team has zero depth. Has holes at LT, G, third WR, TE, DT, LB, CB, and S. Plus will create another hole from one of the 3 players I named. Watson missed the playoffs this past year with a better roster we would put together around him. 
 

amazes me how Tepper preached patience after cutting cam, but now we have a pretty awful roster and wants to move heaven and earth to get this guy. Wont complain about getting a top 5 QB in the game, but just don’t think it’s the right move for this team right now.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...