Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I agree to an extent, but when you are trying to litigate against a VERY famous person, why not get your case as much exposure as possible?  Maybe that's his rationale?  If this was Joe Smoe with a sexual misconduct charge, I doubt he would trying this in the court of public opinion.

 

Lol come on man. This lawyer is clearly seeking celebrity status for his own benefit. He’s so bad at this that it’s taking away from the allegations, the seriousness of it and has casted doubt. It’s the opposite of what you should be doing representing sexual assault victims. Literally all he had to do was file the complaints, make a public statement to the press and that’s it. This is a poo show.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Lol come on man. This lawyer is clearly seeking celebrity status for his own benefit. He’s so bad at this that it’s taking away from the allegations, the seriousness of it and has casted doubt. It’s the opposite of what you should be doing representing sexual assault victims. Literally all he had to do was file the complaints, make a public statement to the press and that’s it. This is a poo show.

About 80% of people when this is over and we trade for him will be all over his nuts. I will be here to remind them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BigCat#1 said:
19 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

Given all that long-time ineptitude, which Deshaun had a front-row seat for...

...why in the heck did he sign a contract obligating him to stick around for additional 4-years?

Expand  

With a no trade clause on top of it...

Excellent point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

Lol come on man. This lawyer is clearly seeking celebrity status for his own benefit. He’s so bad at this that it’s taking away from the allegations, the seriousness of it and has casted doubt. It’s the opposite of what you should be doing representing sexual assault victims. Literally all he had to do was file the complaints, make a public statement to the press and that’s it. This is a poo show.

The life of an egotistical lawyer.  Don't get it twisted, I am not defending this goober (I equate lawyers with pond scum) but trying to figure out what his angle in going this route could be.

I'd much rather go back to the good old days of like--20 years ago--when you had to look in a phone book for a lawyer and not have them on TV commercials, billboards and radio ads. Crap, they are streaming commercials on SLING NOW!

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Yeah. Marines are the most insufferable species on the planet tbh

Not all of us are like that. Dude is just a douche canoe. We make fun of those dipshits. "I'm A MaRiNe." No one cares bro. stfu. You make the rest of look like poo. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Great point, Lexie.

ESPN actually waited over a week to even mention Chad Wheeler beating his girlfriend.

 

ESPN is in the business of selling advertising...

...Deshaun sells -- Chad does not.

Heck never even heard of Chad Wheeler before right now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Great point, Lexie.

ESPN actually waited over a week to even mention Chad Wheeler beating his girlfriend.

 

DeShaun Watson is a superstar and I had to google Chad Wheeler. You can figure out how the two are different from there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...