Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun Allegations detailed (not good)


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

This is what happens when player has more power than owner. Billionaire won’t accept it. Watson appears to be a stand up guy. We know Easterby and Cal are dirty scoundrels. Timing is too coincidental, they want to sink him.

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

Does anybody understand what Houston is doing the last couple of years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

This is a power situation it’s not about winning for the McNair’s. Ego is a real thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I still don't understand this argument one bit, it literally makes zero sense for the Texans ownership/leadership to be behind it whether true or not.

In what way would this benefit McNair?

If true, it would get his QB suspended or worse

If false, it destroys his trade value for a while and likely hurts it regardless.

They'd have been better off keeping it quiet, trading him for a ransom, and then letting all this go public a few days later and let the other team deal with it while you reap the rewards from the trade.

People keep talking about this "not making sense" for the Texans?

What moves have they been making over the last two years or so that HAVE made sense? They get no credit for firing O'Brien after letting him absolutely tank the roster after promoting him to HC/GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

After all the JR stuff, there is no way Tepper can bring this guy here

there would be protests in front of the stadium every day

and the local press would harass Tepper to no end

it’s over 

He could, but would be a huge hypocrite as he scrubbed the organization of everything JR as some sort of moral virtue signaling to the community as the new owner.  I guess billionaires can be complete hypocrites though, right?  He can employ womanizers (putting it mildly) as long he, himself, isn't one.  There's the fine print.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

People keep talking about this "not making sense" for the Texans?

What moves have they been making over the last two years or so that HAVE made sense? They get no credit for firing O'Brien after letting him absolutely tank the roster after promoting him to HC/GM.

& moreover the Texans fired O'Brien after only 4 games into the  2020 season.

another hasty move or better yet let's say reaction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

He could, but would be a huge hypocrite as he scrubbed the organization of everything JR as some sort of moral virtue signaling to the community as the new owner.  I guess billionaires can be complete hypocrites though, right?  He can employ womanizers (putting it mildly) as long he, himself, isn't one.  There's the fine print.

please let me make sure I completely understand what you are saying...?

& that is DeShaun Watson is a womanizer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Feels like a publicity grab. Almost like someone intentionally wanted this lawyer to get his hands on it bc they knew how flamboyant he would be about it.

We’re talking about rape and sexual assault here. This is very fuging serious and this lawyer is doing a Facebook press conference? This is so fuging weird. Not to mention he drunk posts this story on IG at 11 pm at night and talks poo to people commenting that he’s a former marine. The whole thing is a giant mess.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bandu said:

please let me make sure I completely understand what you are saying...?

& that is DeShaun Watson is a womanizer?

I guess 'alleged' at this point, but if true, calling him a womanizer is putting it mild.  You do know the allegations...especially the one the came out today?  If true, then Tepper would be 100% hypocritical to even think about signing Watson here, civil suit or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...