Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Samuel to Washington


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Man, that sucks...  really wanted him back and feel like he's just coming into his own, but once we didn't extend him going into last season, this was pretty much a certainty. 

That being said, it's not a ton of money, and I feel like we could've managed to sign him to something similar, and if I was a young receiver looking for a bigger role, why would I sign with a team that doesn't even have a QB in place under a coach that wasted my talent previously with his archaic offensive philosophy?  Weird.  I guess he really likes Ron.

I just saw the post for the thread!! And posted and I just read your post!! Same thoughts and agree with you!! Such a head scratcher!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Trainwreck said:

I know that AJ Green isn’t the player he used to be but wow at Samuel getting a lot more than Green. I’m willing to be that Golladay may be getting less. 

That happens when the “gadget player” produces twice as many yards as has been like Green. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, amcoolio said:

about saying no to Tray "EJ Manuel" Lance? Nope

Rashawn Slater is a pro-bowl talent. Just take him. Or whoever falls out of Chase/Waddle. Or even Pitts. Its not rocket science.

Well that's a first. Even the few analysts that believe Trey Lance is not a top 10 or even a top 32 pick admit that his upside is off the charts, and they only downgrade him due to his perceived lack of experience compared to the others. No one, save you, has called him E.J. Manuel. That's a baseless hot take!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

   The Reddick signing is solid, but why not use that money spent on backup OL and keep a player at a position where another WRs contract is about to be up. Just don’t see the logic in that. 

5,137 crybaby posts in a row.  Quite an achievement 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...