Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boston Globe says Watson should remain with Texans.


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I'm no fan of the Texans' ownership and I get why they're hated, but the OP's article lays out a pretty clear case that the team holds all the cards in this standoff.  Watson will be forced to play this season if he hopes to avoid taking an extremely significant financial hit.

So why would the Texans ruin Deshaun's reputation/future to play in the NFL, when all they have to do is wait for him to cave due to financial pressure or trade him for a boatload of picks/players?

Attacking Deshaun's reputation while he's under contract would likely destroy both of those options.  It would be like killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

If I were Watson I would show up and be available but tell them he's not feeling well.  

Watson may be forced to stay with the Texans but doesn't mean he has to play at his 100%.   There are a million ways to collect your paycheck and perform well.  How many players get that big contract and become mediocre.  Damn I just missed him by over throw or underthrow. 

The NFL mysteriously puts players on IR all the time just to keep them from being snatched up off a waiver wire.  I'm Watson, I show up but don't play.    

 Watson may be forced to stay with the Texans but doesn't mean he has to play at his 100%.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these women had literally any other lawyer, I'd find this way more believable. But buzbee has lied so many times. Just recently he lied about the police contacting him and he lied about not knowing the McNairs or caring about football when we put up billboards begging "his neighbor Bob mcnair" to sign Manziel. Add on the money grab at the beginning of this and his dirty mayoral campaign... 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I'm no fan of the Texans' ownership and I get why they're hated, but the OP's article lays out a pretty clear case that the team holds all the cards in this standoff.  Watson will be forced to play this season if he hopes to avoid taking an extremely significant financial hit.

So why would the Texans ruin Deshaun's reputation/future to play in the NFL, when all they have to do is wait for him to cave due to financial pressure or trade him for a boatload of picks/players?

Attacking Deshaun's reputation while he's under contract would likely destroy both of those options.  It would be like killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

What about about them wanting to do this so they can void his contract???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

If these women had literally any other lawyer, I'd find this way more believable. But buzbee has lied so many times. Just recently he lied about the police contacting him and he lied about not knowing the McNairs or caring about football when we put up billboards begging "his neighbor Bob mcnair" to sign Manziel. Add on the money grab at the beginning of this and his dirty mayoral campaign... 

Yeah, the level of scum that he seems to be when you start digging into his background makes this all seem pretty suspect. 

I will say, again, that if any of this ever gets traced back to McNair, they should absolutely strip him of his NFL team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Herbert said:

That would be 1st prize in the dumbest idea ever. Get 3 1st round picks and players or get nothing but a few bucks back?

They could get all his money back  and have no dead cap, which they would if they traded him and maybe his career is done also.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I'm no fan of the Texans' ownership and I get why they're hated, but the OP's article lays out a pretty clear case that the team holds all the cards in this standoff.  Watson will be forced to play this season if he hopes to avoid taking an extremely significant financial hit.

So why would the Texans ruin Deshaun's reputation/future to play in the NFL, when all they have to do is wait for him to cave due to financial pressure or trade him for a boatload of picks/players?

Attacking Deshaun's reputation while he's under contract would likely destroy both of those options.  It would be like killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

Possibly to force him into a financial corner. It seems he was prepared/ready to hold out the season if not traded. Which meant he would have been prepared/ready to pay those weekly fines to stand his ground. The initial settlement I think was to put a hole in his pocket and still leak info to the NFL to launch an investigation if that hole wasn’t big enough to change his mind. He will be playing for the Texans. They are controlling the strings so once they get him to break, all of this will gradually disappear and the Texans will look upstanding for “standing by their guy while facing false allegations “. Millionaires play games that make chess look like tic tac toe.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thomas9289 said:

They could get all his money back  and have no dead cap, which they would if they traded him and maybe his career is done also.

So would you take that or trade his contract for 3 first a couple of seconds and starters to save a few million. Even Texas isnt that dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Herbert said:

So would you take that or trade his contract for 3 first a couple of seconds and starters to save a few million. Even Texas isnt that dumb.

If they could destroy his career/life at the same time it wouldn’t be dumb. You assume they care about being a successful football organization when there is zero evidence to support that whack job theory.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, t96 said:

Who the fug cares what the Boston Globe says? Worthless paper.

And honestly, they didn't present anything new in this article. We've all heard the same arguments here, but for the new situation and circumstances surrounding it, weeks ago! And at least in my mind, this new situation doesn't make him any more likely to want to be a Texan. The new reasoning--if you can call it that--is poppycock!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

If these women had literally any other lawyer, I'd find this way more believable. But buzbee has lied so many times. Just recently he lied about the police contacting him and he lied about not knowing the McNairs or caring about football when we put up billboards begging "his neighbor Bob mcnair" to sign Manziel. Add on the money grab at the beginning of this and his dirty mayoral campaign... 

If you’re going to risk your law license by supporting or soliciting a fabrication like this, you’re gonna make sure you can control your client(s).

You can control or coordinate 1 or 2 people. 

But 20+? 

For this to be a big lie, Buzbee would have had to 

1) Track down every woman that has proof of massaging Deshaun. Small group.

2) Approach all of them and hope they all agree to put their necks on the line to go along with the lie.

If one woman says no and goes to the press (for a different payday) to reveal that they were asked to lie, it’s over. 

That’s a massive risk for the lawyers and women accusing Deshaun.

IF the Texans or NFL is behind this in anyway, it’s far more likely that they dug up this dirt on him and decided to use it to set an example of him.

It doesn’t mean he’s innocent though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...