Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold


unicar15
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Yep.

#8 overall for Minshew and the two Jacksonville second round picks. I mentioned this before but That would be the deal I’d be trying to push. I’d even do Minshew, a second and a third for our #8.

how good do you think Minshew is? I read nfl.com article stating he would go for a 4th at max.... His stats do not reflect his inability to read a defense and weak arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Darnold or Minshew?

neither jets or jags are going to get a first round pick in return for thes quarterbacks. They dont have leverage. They are assumingly going to draft their replacements. All teams are going to low ball offer them bc otherwise they just have an extra bench warmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

Teddy had maybe the best three receiver lineup in the entire NFL and couldn’t eclipse 4000 passing yards. We saw his best season last year. That was it...

I don’t think anyone in the NFL thinks that we’ve seen the best of Darnold yet bc Gase is such a disaster. 
 

Flipping a 3rd for Darnold as a backup to not getting Watson imo is maybe as good or better plan to trading a treasure trove for a top 3 pick. Unless coaches think his problems just aren’t repairable. 

The same three receivers that had career years with Bridgewater last season?

This narrative people are spinning is weird. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Darnold or Minshew?

Darnold. He was the 3rd overall pick just 2 years ago and pretty much everybody is still decently high on him, from the huddle to the media, with most people saying the Jets aren’t really his fault. If you hear all those takes in the media, you’ll probably hear similar around NFL front offices.

And I think the huddle is generally overly optimistic about minimizing what we would have to give up to acquire players or draft picks or what we can get in return for players/draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

neither jets or jags are going to get a first round pick in return for thes quarterbacks. They dont have leverage. They are assumingly going to draft their replacements. All teams are going to low ball offer them bc otherwise they just have an extra bench warmer.

These guys are on team friendly rookie contracts. They don’t have to sell at all.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

how good do you think Minshew is? I read nfl.com article stating he would go for a 4th at max.... His stats do not reflect his inability to read a defense and weak arm.

I think he is a little better than teddy and is still improving. I think a third is right for him.  I was impressed when we faced him and I thought he looked even better until he hurt his hand. Contract is decent, player is young.

A third and two seconds would match up with our first round pick on the draft value chart, I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...