Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Pitts as a WR/TE Good for Carolina ?

Leotiger

By Leotiger,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

chbright Veteran

chbright

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Varking said:

I’m a Gator homer. I just don’t see Trask as an elite NFL QB. As you said, the arm strength isn’t horrific but it is lesser and he doesn’t have much in the way of mobility. He needs elite weapons or a great line to give him time to make reads. Grimes should go well before the 6th.

I'll say this: Jones at 8 vs Trask in the 3rd, I take Trask all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

Trask has an arm but he's more technical and goes through his reads very quickly, has a very high release point with a very quick release. THATS how he got 4300 yrds 43TDs and only 8INTS playing against the best college teams, Bama, LSU.

The Steelers see Trask as a 6'5" 240lb Big Ben replacement. He won't be there in the third and will not make it through the second if he gets past the Steelers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

Sweet. I hope ATL takes him at 4. Lawrence, Wilson, Mac, Pitts, leaves both Fields and Lance with 3 picks until us. We could trade with the Bengals at 5 or Dolphins at 6 to get Fields/Lance which hopefully wouldn’t cost too much since it’s only 3/2 spots...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leotiger Enthusiast

Leotiger

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Trask has an arm but he's more technical and goes through his reads very quickly, has a very high release point with a very quick release. THATS how he got 4300 yrds 43TDs and only 8INTS playing against the best college teams, Bama, LSU.

The Steelers see Trask as a 6'5" 240lb Big Ben replacement. He won't be there in the third and will not make it through the second if he gets past the Steelers.

Love Trask but Pitts helped a lot of those stats out .. still think he is a solid qb but not the qb we are trying to go all in around 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Leotiger said:

Love Trask but Pitts helped a lot of those stats out .. still think he is a solid qb but not the qb we are trying to go all in around 

Pitts had like 750yrds this year iirc.

4300-750=3550 yrds

 

That's still pretty damn good even without Pitts, much better than most of his peers.

He may not be flashy but he's a much better QB than teh huddle gives credit for. Another one of those QBs people will be wondering about why he wasn't picked by the genius bottom feeder NFL teams.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...