Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Pitts as a WR/TE Good for Carolina ?


Leotiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Chicago Bulls What GIF by NBA

Either he's a generational talent or he had a great QB.

Him and Trask wrecked shop. Stats not favor.

Which one is it? They got chunks of yards and TDs, playing football. Often against elite talent like LSU with lesser complimentary talent.

Oh it's their OC, that must be it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Either he's a generational talent or he had a great QB.

Him and Trask wrecked shop. Stats not favor.

Which one is it? They got chunks of yards and TDs, playing football. Often against elite talent like LSU with lesser complimentary talent.

Oh it's their OC, that must be it!

take Pitts at 8 and Trask at 39 who knows ??? Tho rather not waste an early draft pick on a qb if we don’t think he can be the one ..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Either he's a generational talent or he had a great QB.

Him and Trask wrecked shop. Stats not favor.

Which one is it? They got chunks of yards and TDs, playing football. Often against elite talent like LSU with lesser complimentary talent.

Oh it's their OC, that must be it!

You are aware that was college football, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jesse said:

The only time a WR (basically what Pitts is projected to play) in the top 10 is if they have a Julio Jones/Calvin Johnson trajectory. Otherwise you can find those guys in rounds 2-4.
 

Top 10 picks should be: QB; get to the QB; protect the QB. 

Exactly.  I love it when people start their man crush on Pitts by saying "think of him as a WR" to try to get over the TE position value constraints.  Well, the only damn reason Pitts is rated so high is because he is so unique as a pass catcher at the TE position.  As a WR he's not all that unique...not one of the top 3 WRs...and possibly not even a 1st round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Exactly.  I love it when people start their man crush on Pitts by saying "think of him as a WR" to try to get over the TE position value constraints.  Well, the only damn reason Pitts is rated so high is because he is so unique as a pass catcher at the TE position.  As a WR he's not all that unique...not one of the top 3 WRs...and possibly not even a 1st round pick.

This is a mismatch league .. he is a walking mismatch ! Carolina might not be it but if he drops past 10 .. future 1st #39 and #74 for him hell throw in Ian Thomas 

 

hopefully lance or Fields drops to us at 8

Edited by Leotiger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vagrant said:

i don't think people fully understand how much of a problem it would be to coach your linebackers to cover both CMC and a guy like this. It would be comical to see it attempted. when people talk about quarterback and its importance, that's valid. but at what position can we most improve our WAR, for lack of a better football stat, should be the focus. make our team so good that we set up whoever our next quarterback is for success before he even arrives. we had less than ideal QB play last season, but there are available arms that could probably give us neutral 20-25th in the league type performance with as many weapons as we'd have. it could potentially even be teddy, as much as that idea sucks. 

they may have tipped their hand a little by not making a more concerted effort after kyle rudolph if we're looking at stop gap guys to transition that can still provide value. i think he's an absolute consideration when you look around the league at the guys who are matchup nightmares at that position and what they are able to do for you. gronk took a year off and the league still didn't have an answer for it. if you think this kid is george kittle, you better take him. i try to look at it like what addition would the league be most disappointed by for us, and a viable tight end would do SO MUCH in terms of having a large catch radius target with all our smaller WR options. we don't have that 3rd and short guy who can box out and fall forward and it hurt our drives last season especially in the red zone. we fix that we add some real value and simultaneously make this QB opening a sincere landing spot the way the Bucs were built to prepare for Brady inadvertently before he even got there. the build it and he will come strategy. 

No what’s comical it’s thinking Teddy can do anything with Pitts or our wrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could you imagine what this team would like if the typical huddler made decisions 

wasted picks on every 'cant miss' talent at every peripheral position on the field and double digit 5th round picks and double digit losses every season after we move down constantly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...