Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just to note


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Teddy Bridgewater  had career highs in TDs, yards, completions, completion percentage, yards per game, and QBR in 2020.

I'd say Brady had a pretty good influence on Teddy.

Oh ok. So then we’ll have no problem trading him. 
 

wait scratch that- why are we trading him? If he played so well?

 

saying he had career highs in yards etc means absolutely nothing as it’s a volume driven stat. He’s a career backup that had played what 1 full season as a rookie prior?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

And Brady’s influence on teddys career resurgence. Oh wait

almost like burrow chase Jefferson CEH etc made Brady’s job easy at LSU

 

2 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

Oh ok. So then we’ll have no problem trading him. 
wait scratch that- why are we trading him? If he played so well?

saying he had career highs in yards etc means absolutely nothing as it’s a volume driven stat. He’s a career backup that had played what 1 full season as a rookie prior?

Bringing up his trade value now is irrelevant to your original premise. 

Your stated premise was that Brady had no influence Bridgewater or Burrow. Bridgewater had the best year statistically of his career much like how Burrow had his best year under Brady. I submit this is strong evidence that Brady did have a similar positive influences on him like he did on Burrow, and your original premise was flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Verge said:

At the end of the day, you have to trust that our coaching staff knows what they are doing when they put the stamp of approval on Darnold. 

the Huddle is always open for new threads if you dont like what the coaching staff is doing...

😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

Oh ok. So then we’ll have no problem trading him. 
 

wait scratch that- why are we trading him? If he played so well?

 

saying he had career highs in yards etc means absolutely nothing as it’s a volume driven stat. He’s a career backup that had played what 1 full season as a rookie prior?

keep digging, this is getting comical now

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

In a division with Tom Brady and Matt Ryan, the Panthers have....Sam Darnold. How many times did Darnolds jets beat Brady again ?
 

i am really tired of this owner....and his process.  Year 4 of losing incoming 
 

I wish I could be optimistic but Rhule is still div 1 to me 

more clowns coming out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

In a division with Tom Brady and Matt Ryan, the Panthers have....Sam Darnold. How many times did Darnolds jets beat Brady again ?
 

i am really tired of this owner....and his process.  Year 4 of losing incoming 
 

I wish I could be optimistic but Rhule is still div 1 to me 

I am going to be an optimist here. I saw some good things last year with a lot of holes to fill. Getting Darnold allows the team to fill some of those holes to build a strong team around a QB. As we have all said we have gone way too long without adequately addressing the Oline. We have some good offensive weapons and Darnold will have a chance to become a better QB than he was in NY.  I bet Robby Anderson had some thoughts to share about the poo show that he and  Darnold experienced with the Jets. A change of scenery did Robby some good for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...