Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Position Group Strength Rankings

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I usually do not start threads (I end them), but when things get a bit dry, I try to find something to stir it up a bit.  This article is about 4 weeks old, but since we are starved for new content during this "calm before the storm" period, I thought we would revisit/visit it for the first time.  It sure seems like a good year to be us. 

First, any year you have 4 QBs going in the top 10 (likely) with the possibility of 2 more creeping into round 1, that is a good QB class and it deserves to be the top position group.  So you might be thinking with your brains, "Why are the Panthers not all up in that QB frenzy in round 1?  Why did they trade for a player that seems to be on the cusp of bustdom?"  Well, they think they can change Darnold's fate and at #8, you are hoping for the 4th best QB who may not be the best fit for your system.  The Tanneyhill effect was huge, and I am sure they heard from a lot of folks who understand what it was like to play in NY.  So we get our young QB prospect for 1 second rounder next year and some day 3 picks.  Some say we paid too much.  That remains to be seen, but if he does what I think he can do, we stole him.

2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  I disagree, however, that QBs are the top position group because they have 4 top 10 players. If you stretch the scope to the first 2 rounds, the best position group is unquestionably Offensive Tackle.  

"As things stand, PFF has a first-round grade on seven offensive tackles and Day 2 grades on six more. That’s a LOADED class. While last year’s group was top-heavy, this year’s has serious depth. There’s a chance you’ll be able to find immediate starters leaking into the second round, which is something that rarely happens at the position."

So what does that mean, if you are the GM trying to meet as many needs as you can during the draft?  We can wait and grab a T at 39?  Maybe. 

3. WIDE RECEIVER: I know some of you are against a first round WR, but if you look at the fact that we could get a starting T in the second round and we would love to give Darnold all the weapons possible, how does Fitterer not start frothing at the mouth when he sees what might be sitting there at #8? I imagine the Panthers are looking beyond 2021 when they make a pick, and our WR corps will be getting expensive soon, when Moore decides his payday is here.  Anderson and Moore are not locked into long-term deals, and we did very little to replace Samuel.  Regardless of what we think--what will the panthers think?  We can give Darnold and LT and a weapon of starting quality if we draft a WR then a LT in round 2.   If we take a LT in round 1, what round 2 WRs are ready to start?  I dunno, just spitballing, but if we draft a WR in round 1, understand that we are getting a super talent AND we will probably take a T in round 2 who can play this game.

"If you want that game-changing wide receiver, this is the year to do it. Ja’Marr Chase, Jaylen Waddle and DeVonta Smith all rank inside PFF’s top 10 players."

4. INTERIOR OL:  The fourth most stacked position group is interior OL.  That may mean a good C/G is there on day 3.

5. CORNERBACK:  Remember that Fitterer was determined to keep the first 3 picks of the draft when he dealt with the Jets to get Darnold.  That trade was not about what we gave up, it was about what we did NOT give up.  If the Panthers agree with PFF, they may feel that they are in position to pull a Chinn and trade back up (or let a CB fall) and get that CB with the third Panther selection.

"The cornerback group features 16 guys in PFF’s top 100, although there are not too many true blue-chippers at the position in the class. The strength is quite clearly throughout Day 2, where there are a ton of intriguing skill sets."

Enjoy the article if you have not already seen it, but it may be a hint towards our draft strategy:

https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2021-nfl-draft-best-position-groups

 

  • Pie 10
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

I understand the logic of a top receiver when our guys are signed long term, but I still want one of the top 2 tackles. 

Then again, what I want, and what the team ends up doing draft day are normally 2 different things. 

That is my point too.  If Sewell is there?  No thinking required.  If Slater and Waddle are on the board?  It could get interesting.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
57 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Good post

I think we can get a 3rd/4th WR on day 3 but if Kyle Pitts isn't there at #8 I don't believe we will draft a TE this year.

Very poor class overall and there won't be a clear upgrade over what we have on the roster now in the latter rounds. 

I agree and thank you.  I guess the question is:  Are Waddle, Smith, and Chase THAT good?  Would they make this offense unstoppable?  I read a post on another site about Darnold and the need for a slot:  He has never been able to change plays at the LOS or call hot routes.  If the Panthers want to turn him loose, we need a slot that is a game breaker.  A slot that can run the slant, a slot that the defense gives a 10-yard cushion.  A hot route runner that keeps the S honest and works the middle as well as the sidelines-a player that stretches the secondary...."  (paraphrasing). 

I dunno.  I am like everyone else--get the elite T.  If you wait for round 2 and there has been a run on OTs, we could be in the Greg Little situation again.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Good post

I think we can get a 3rd/4th WR on day 3 but if Kyle Pitts isn't there at #8 I don't believe we will draft a TE this year.

Very poor class overall and there won't be a clear upgrade over what we have on the roster now in the latter rounds. 

NFL Network replayed the 2020 Arizona versus Philly game this afternoon. I came away impressed with Dan Arnold (and Hassan Reddick). I don't think TE is nearly the issue it was last session after signing him.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Agent Blue Newbie

Agent Blue

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

If Pitts and Sewell are gone, but Slater and Chase are there....that's a tough choice.  I don't think Chase will be, but he has better than All Pro level talent...good chance of Hall of Fame.  Tough call.

An above average competent OT/C/OG (esp OT) is more valuable than a good / great WR. 

We literally have ONE competent OL player on our roster.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Black&BlueBubba Proficient

Black&BlueBubba

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Good post

I think we can get a 3rd/4th WR on day 3 but if Kyle Pitts isn't there at #8 I don't believe we will draft a TE this year.

Very poor class overall and there won't be a clear upgrade over what we have on the roster now in the latter rounds. 

If Pitts isn’t there I think they are looking at Jacob Harris out of UCF in the late rounds. He is like Dan Arnold 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, trueblade said:

NFL Network replayed the 2020 Arizona versus Philly game this afternoon. I came away impressed with Dan Arnold (and Hassan Reddick). I don't think TE is nearly the issue it was last session after signing him.

That is good news.  I really have not looked to see about him---did not know what we have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

A lot of you want to bargin bin hunt on wrs which i get, but I dont want to pass on a hof caliber talent like Chase for a maybe good LT like Slater... He played well vs Chase young is all i hear but what else...Give me the more talent players and i will bargin on the position with a deeper base pool after that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      The Hurricanes are never getting over the hump untill they spend money in the net

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I agree. Two holes FTW!
    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control. Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst rosters in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most volatile franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete disaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
×
×
  • Create New...