Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers likely trading back in the first


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, trueblade said:

Think about this nightmare scenario

JAX - Lawrence
NYJ - Wilson
SF - Fields
ATL - Pitts
CIN - Sewell
MIA - Slater
DET - Lance

I'd be looking to trade down. It's good Fitts has already made some calls.

How is this a nightmare? We take Chase and never look back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do we get with a Redskins trade back to 19?

And don't say "3 first rounders and all their picks this year"

If someone can give some realistic answers, it would be nice, but again, this is the Huddle

I think we get Darrisaw at 19 fairly easily, same as getting Slater at 8, and we get next years first and maybe a couple more this year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RumHam said:

SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKE SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN. Of course this franchise would fug up the possibility to get an immediate impact player.

This is not your daddy’s Panthers. Might as well be an expansion team at this point. You people have got to get rid of the ghost of Hurney/Richardson. They’re not here anymore.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, section543 said:

I’ve done a couple mocks lately where Sewell and Slater are both gone by 8. Would you guys against trading back be more likely to want to trade back if that happened?

Yes. Take Chase at 8 and kill people on offense for the next 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

You know who I love, but is too high at 8 and won’t be available Round 2? Greg Newsome. Love his movement skills. In my opinion, you have 4 marquee corners and then a big drop. Some talent is in this draft for OL and WR that can be secured in Round 2

Newsome is going to be a very good NFL CB IMO. I could see him and Horne being better than Surtain (who should be solid).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I felt pretty good about us making progress this season, surprising some people, and getting some more wins than last season going into it.  Now, after preseason, my expectations are much, much lower. I was talking with my friend who is a Bears fan, and we were discussing their drubbing of the Bills and how people try to dismiss it as “preseason, so it doesn’t count.”  It absolutely counts.  Not the wins or losses.  No one really cares about that.  But what the Bears are doing shows that even in a vanilla, non-specific scheme, they are executing at an elite level and they are disciplined.  It shows they are well coached.  They see growth in their players.  Versus us - hard to tell what we’re looking at because everything is a fuging mess.  In games we’re still undisciplined, be it penalties or assignments.  We do NOT execute.  We got random coaches calling plays that won’t be calling plays during the season, we have our players getting into fights in the last padded practice of the preseason, then we have Bryce and Chuba trying to correct it while our coach sat off to the side laughing.  To be clear, I like Canales.  He seems like a good dude.  But, it feels like we have very little direction and discipline.  You’re allowing a team who has been historically bad the last almost decade, with a losing culture that mostly bereft of talent to self-police?  You’re allowing subordinates to work in pet projects at the expense of getting valuable reps and evaluation of players in during games?     My friend literally brought up last night that when Ben Johnson got there he essentially put DJ Moore in notice because it was starting to be perceived that he was displaying some diva-behavior.  That’s leadership.  And they’re reaping the benefits early and setting a tone.  My friend said there is an excitement and confidence in and around their team that’s he’s never felt his entire life.  And here we are, sounding and looking like The Bad News Bears in our final week of training camp and preseason.  I literally stopped watching after halftime last week.  I used to watch every play faithfully, even in 2001 and 2010.  It was fun.  This isn’t.  We are bad and our administration keeps making bad decisions to compound things.  Reading poo like this today is just fuging deflating.
    • With so much of the focus the past couple years being on offense, the defense has definitely taken a backseat to the talent available in the draft. I get it, they want to surround their number one draft pick QB with offensive playmakers but unfortunately that has come with a price that so far has not worked Let’s hope the offense and Bryce Young put it together this year or it’s going to be another rebuild next year with another new QB. 
    • I was intrigued by him but always said it comes down to the interview process and talking to his former coaches, etc. You gotta find out if he's coachable and has the mental makeup. I think we've found the answer. LOL
×
×
  • Create New...