Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots have talked to the Panthers about a draft day trade

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)

My head will explode if Fields is there and they don’t take him and drop that low 

there is nothing about Darnold that screams ‘winner’ 

the panthers just had one reclamation project fail and that was with  someone Brady wanted AND knew his system

i’d hedge my bets and take Fields if he is there 

I guess I had too many years of Fox passing on the likes of Aaron and Big Ben because he was happy with Jake 

you are either getting better or you are getting worse in the nfl.   

as far as Darnold, tape don’t lie. 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 5
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
On 4/26/2021 at 2:05 PM, Panthers Rhule said:

There's no way the Pats are talking to us about potentially trading up from 15 to 8 for anything other than a QB. I know that there are many who are still dreaming about Fields but it's not going to happen. The writing's on every wall. Go ahead and accept it now and the draft will be much more pleasant. 

will ferrel step brothers GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

I’d take their 2021 1st, a 2021 4th (they have four), 2022 1st, and 2022 4th

At 15, could be looking at Darrisaw, Horn, Surtain, Teven Jenkins, some good options. Wonder if we think Richie Grant is a 1st rounder? That may be a reach but you never know. Seattle had the rep for making what seemed to be slight reaches high up that worked out because they fit the team great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaMan Mentor

PandaMan

Posted
Posted

I honestly don’t want to trade down.  With the QB run likely to happen before 8 we can get a premiere talent. If they make it a worthwhile deal, sure, but idk.  Normally I would be good with it, but this year is different with the uncertainty and QB heavy top.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...