Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

BPA OL is what I would do in the 2nd and 3rd. 

I want at least 3 OL out of this draft.

You have to, I mean the fuse is lit now.  You cannot roll Darnold out there as things stand right now.  And I doubt a 2nd round Left tackle is going to move the needle very much at this point. 

 

Once I get over this hangover I am going to finish what I started last night in going through the top left tackles in the league and seeing where they were drafted.  So far its well over 80% in the first round.  I am not liking our chances of finding a stud at 39.  And I still think we are trading back.  fug me why didnt we go slater?  If we were going to reach might as well have been for a LT.  I truly do not understand this poo

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

You have to, I mean the fuse is lit now.  You cannot roll Darnold out there as things stand right now.  And I doubt a 2nd Left tackle is going to move the needle very much at this point. 

 

Once I get over this hangover I am going to finish what I started last night in going through the top left tackles in the league and seeing where they were drafted.  So far its well over 80% in the first round.  I am not liking our chances of finding a stud at 39.  And I still think we are trading back.  fug me why didnt we go slater?  If we were going to reach might as well have been for a LT.  I truly do not understand this poo

You and me both. Slater will, at worst, be a very high level IOL, IMO. 

If we don't bolster this OL in the rest of the draft, I don't see much hope for Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You and me both. Slater will, at worst, be a very high level IOL, IMO. 

If we don't bolster this OL in the rest of the draft, I don't see much hope for Darnold.

As I sit here reading the articles/draft profiles about both Horn and Slater all I can do is simply shake my head.  I feel exactly like I did a year ago and thinking "this poo again, we never fuging learn".  At some goddamn point we have to draft a fuging lineman in the first round.  This is insanity.  How the fug can you think about putting together a playoff team without an offensive line.  I have watched football for 40 years and this concept hasnt changed one bit in that timeframe.  What am I missing that this team is seeing?

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

As I sit here reading the articles/draft profiles about both Horn and Slater all I can do is simply shake my head.  I feel exactly like I did a year ago and thinking "this poo again, we never fuging learn".  At some goddamn point we have to draft a fuging lineman in the first round.  This is insanity.  How the fug can you think about putting together a playoff team without an offensive line.  I have watched football for 40 years and this concept has changed one bit in that timeframe.  What am I missing that this team is seeing?

I don't get it either. If we neglect it this draft, I just will not understand it. The FA moves were so bad on the OL too. We are on a whole new set of owner/GM/coach and getting the same results. I don't know how to explain it.

Maybe they surprise us and go OL heavy the rest of the draft. I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pup McBarky Proficient

Pup McBarky

Posted
Posted

Cosmi or Spencer Brown. They may trade back, thinking they can get Brown later. Both are outstanding athletes with technical issues, but our staff is supposed to be great at teaching, so we'll see.

We may also pick Meinerz at 39 (if he's still on the board) particularly given his ability to play G or C.

If we go S or LB, or even DL here, it won't be the end of the world. Plenty of good OL prospects in round 3. Would be difficult to pass on Jevon Holland or Onwuzurike here, since those positions drop precipitously in talent later on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riverboat Ron Mentor

Riverboat Ron

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, woahfraze said:

Teven Jenkins.  I know his pass pro. isn't quite on the level as his run blocking, but oooeee, he is a road-grading mauler that plays with a mean streak in the run game. I know that might "sound" like a RT and not a LT, but I don't think he's incapable of playing on the left. Also, he's got to be better than who we have currently over there.  Obviously it would be nice for the team to give Moton a shot over at LT, where many feel he could also thrive.  But I don't think the Moton or the team have interest in screwing up a good thing, and he'll stay over on the right and continue to lock it down.  

Also, having Jenkins is insurance in case they can't reach an extension agreement with Moton.  If Moton leaves and Jenkins is better suited to RT, we can slide him over.

This. If we're giving Moton the butt load of cash he wants, prove that he can play LT. Jenkins would be a plug and play RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      No more free refills?

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      I went to McDonald's at lunch got a combo for $12. It was ok. The next day I ordered lunch from Cracker Barrel got the broccoli cheddar chicken, steak fries, and 2 biscuits paid $12 with tip. Guess which was better. 
    • alfiya
      What is a {{>>QuickBooks File Doctor }}>>&<<< How do I use it>>>? ^^^+1-844-476-5438^^^^

      By alfiya · Posted

      QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is a diagnostic tool provided by Intuit to help users resolve common issues related to company files in QuickBooks Desktop. It is designed to diagnose and repair problems that may prevent users from opening, accessing, or using their company files properly. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore what QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 is, how it works, and how you can use it to troubleshoot and fix issues with your QuickBooks company files effectively. To help you fix this problem, we have some resources in this article. But if you need expert help, you can contact us anytime. We have a team of QuickBooks experts who are available 24/7 to assist you. Just call our support line at  +1-844-476-5438. What is QuickBooks File Doctor? QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is a standalone application developed by Intuit to assist users in diagnosing and resolving issues related to QuickBooks company files. It combines the functionality of two previously separate tools: the QuickBooks Company File Diagnostic Tool and the QuickBooks Network Connectivity Diagnostic Tool. QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 can diagnose and repair a wide range of issues, including network connectivity problems, data corruption, and file integrity issues. Method 2: How Does QuickBooks File Doctor Work? QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 works by scanning and analyzing QuickBooks company files to identify and repair any issues that may be affecting their functionality. The tool employs advanced diagnostic algorithms to detect problems with company files and automatically fix them whenever possible. QuickBooks File Doctor can repair common issues such as network errors, data corruption, and file damage, helping users restore their company files to a healthy state. Method 3: How to Use QuickBooks File Doctor Using QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 is relatively straightforward. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to use the tool: Download and Install QuickBooks File Doctor: Start by downloading QuickBooks File Doctor from the official Intuit website. Once downloaded, run the installation file and follow the on-screen instructions to install the tool on your computer. Launch QuickBooks File Doctor: After installing QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438, launch the application by double-clicking its icon on your desktop or searching for it in the Windows Start menu. Select Company File: In QuickBooks File Doctor, you’ll be prompted to select the company file you want to diagnose and repair. Choose the company file from the list or browse to locate it on your computer. Diagnose and Repair: Once you’ve selected the company file, QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 will begin scanning it for issues. The tool will automatically detect and repair any problems it finds, such as network connectivity issues, data corruption, or file integrity issues. Follow On-Screen Instructions: Throughout the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438will provide on-screen instructions and prompts to guide you through the steps. Follow these instructions carefully to ensure that the tool can effectively diagnose and repair issues with your company file. Review Repair Results: After completing the diagnostic and repair process, QuickBooks File Doctor +1-844-476-5438 will display a summary of the results. Review the results to ensure that the tool has successfully resolved any issues with your company file. Verify File Integrity: Once QuickBooks File Doctor+1-844-476-5438 has repaired your company file, it’s a good idea to verify its integrity by opening it in QuickBooks Desktop and checking for any remaining issues or errors.
    • lightsout
      Goodbye chain gang?

      By lightsout · Posted

      I don't think so. I think once you're measuring electronically, the spot is where the sensor says it is. So if it says half yard short of the line to gain, that's the spot. Now how that works with scrums and the ball moving on two minute drills and poo is anybody's guess.
×
×
  • Create New...