Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did we actually gain with the trading down


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm telling you how the evaluators see it, and yes it makes sense.

If you were asked to hire five people this year based solely on stats but couldn't meet or talk to any of them while knowing that next year you also needed to hire people but would be able to fully interview and vet them, which of those two processes would you have more confidence in?

Yeah, we know it was a different year for talent rvakuation. What does any of this have to do with the reality that it has always been standard practice to evaluate future draft picks as roughly one round lesser value?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, we know it was a different year for talent rvakuation. What does any of this have to do with the reality that it has always been standard practice to evaluate future draft picks as roughly one round lesser value?

 

It has to do with the fact that this year isn't standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It has to do with the fact that this year isn't standard.

Understood. But the future draft pick evaluation pretty much was. It's always been roughly one round less, regardless of what spin teams want to put on it. COVID has kinda become a catch all excuse for explaining business decisions. You can go into a lot of evaluation detail or you can just blame COVID. Hell, I'd just blame COVID too. A lot simpler that way and if anyone questions it just call them a COVID denier and mock them. It's lazy, but it's a win/win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Cutting or trading Jackson saves the team $2.4m and leaves about $400k in dead cap.

There is no way this happens.... as mention on the huddle many times before.... Jackson was a shutdown corner when healthy last year. He is cheap talent to cut. Plus Fitts loves him some Jackson. I can’t think of a player he has talked about more than Jackson 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Understood. But the future draft pick evaluation pretty much was. It's always been roughly one round less, regardless of what spin teams want to put on it. COVID has kinda become a catch all excuse for explaining business decisions. You can go into a lot of evaluation detail or you can just blame COVID. Hell, I'd just blame COVID too. A lot simpler that way and if anyone questions it just call them a COVID denier and mock them. It's lazy, but it's a win/win.

How do you evaluate talent that hasn’t played in over a year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was frustrated with all of the trades. I understand the concept, but as a fan, you keep watching talented players fall off the board at positions of need and it’s frustrating. At the end of the day, I didn’t hate our draft. I just hope this new staff is better at evaluating late round picks than the last staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, MechaZain said:

 

 

They got who they wanted and Fitterer pulled more draft capital out of thin air.

This and more of this.  I have been screaming at Hurney for years loosing every trade and coming out with a bust like Little while loosing valuable 2nd and 3rd round picks.  Just kills your roster.  
 

Time will tell but having more swings and getting guys that fall like Nixon, Brown can make the difference long term. 
 

With a 17 game season I love the building depth strategy.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

I was frustrated with all of the trades. I understand the concept, but as a fan, you keep watching talented players fall off the board at positions of need and it’s frustrating. At the end of the day, I didn’t hate our draft. I just hope this new staff is better at evaluating late round picks than the last staff.

Can’t get caught up in the name game. You are more likely to get a few hits swinging 11 times than you are swinging 6 times. It’s really that simple. 

That being said, can’t wait until 1-2 of these guys doesn’t make the team out of camp and masses start screaming about being right on trading down. Will be fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 11:54 AM, TheCasillas said:

Not sure why we are trying to break this down.... our moves were perceived by the league as good moves. Why put in the effort to cast doubt ?

As someone that missed large swaths of night two, I didn't even really get a full grasp of what we did.  This breakdown is actually useful for me just to see the outcome, not cast judgment either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

All draft pools are not equal. You may not want to acknowledge this fact, but you know that it's absolutely true on an intellectual level. 

These scouting departments scout players from highschool (sometimes earlier) through college.

Sure, I agree each draft class isn’t equal, so why is the concept that the current class is always more valuable than the future class? Sounds like we’re on the same page, it should vary from year to year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

In years when there there was no Covid, sure.

It's different this year, and multiple NFL people echo that sentiment.

Sure, but that’s not what Rhule said. He said “his guys” (not entirely sure what that means but would presume fitts and co) valued a 3rd this year as a future 2nd. You seem to be saying the opposite (which I would agree with)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Can’t get caught up in the name game. You are more likely to get a few hits swinging 11 times than you are swinging 6 times. It’s really that simple. 

That being said, can’t wait until 1-2 of these guys doesn’t make the team out of camp and masses start screaming about being right on trading down. Will be fun. 

You’re not wrong at all. It was frustrating watching the draft, but listening to Rhule and Fitterer discuss their decision afterwards eased my mind. I like the direction this team is heading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...