Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

South Carolina and Rock Hill having issues paying for the Panthers new HQ


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

I saw a few comments on a posting from Twitter saying the funding was to go towards roads being upgraded to prevent traffic congestion vs all this money being put the the facility itself. Not saying that makes a difference, but just sharing as I had assumed it was just the facility itself 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

If you could see the eyes rolling out of my head. You just used an example of two seperate billionaires splitting the bill in the biggest per capita market on Earth. 

Your point is?

The original statement was:  

"...there is no precedent for it, the tax payers have always footed the bill..."

Said statement is false.

 

 

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Does Tepper actually pay for anything himself? I heard, when he was interviewing FO staff for the Panthers, he made the interviewee pay the tab. I'm seriously not a fan of this guy. The community should own the team like GB.

(I know lots of teams tax their home cities for the stadiums. Doesn't make it right.)

Kinda doubt that, especially given that since a lot of those interviews are being conducted via Zoom.

No "tab" involved in a virtual interview.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Your statement is categorically false.  

The new Jets/Giants stadium was built with 100% private funding.  

 

Oh NO, one stadium was privately funded. So 93 percent of stadiums will continue to expect public tax pay money and will continue to get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

According to Hart, $225 million worth of bonds were supposed to have been issued by the city no later than October 31, 2020. After discussions with the developer of the project, this deadline was later extended to February 26, 2021. This borrowing was supposed to have been repaid with an increase in property taxes on local residents – and Rock Hill agreed to forego 100 percent of its tax revenue until the debt was paid off.

Did Rock Hill meet the second deadline? No …

“To date, the bonds have not yet been issued,” the letter stated.



https://www.fitsnews.com/2021/05/14/carolina-panthers-deal-rock-hill-sc-is-coming-up-short/

Nelson Muntz - Ha Ha - YouTube

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, countryboi said:

Oh NO, one stadium was privately funded. So 93 percent of stadiums will continue to expect public tax pay money and will continue to get it. 

Only if the local residents keep electing pussies who are afraid to tell the billionaires no.  

Watching Charlotte City Council fold to Richardson's L.A. bluff was hilarious...he had nothing.  

Gov. Pat McCrory actually told him no on behalf of the state.  

I'm sure the current Gov. will bend over and take it in the jacksey...

  • Flames 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, countryboi said:

Oh NO, one stadium was privately funded. So 93 percent of stadiums will continue to expect public tax pay money and will continue to get it. 

This stuff is pretty easy to find.  About 3 minutes worth of a search finds that Metlife, StubHub (Chargers), and Gillette were all 100% privately funded.

Levi's Stadium (49ers) was 88% privately funded.  BofA was 77% privately funded.  FedEx and Mercedes-Benz were both about 70% or more privately funded.  Even the Jerry's Excess Palace in Arlington, TX was roughly 2/3rds privately funded.

I don't like the idea of governments funding these things at all.  The economics never work out the way teams and politicians advertise they will.  And when they don't work out, they don't miss on the side of the taxpayers.  But let's do some due diligence before we make claims that are so easy to disprove that even a caveman can do it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And on the subject of financing, SoFi (Rams, Chargers) was also privately funded.  So while StubHub went away, SoFi replaced it.  I was surprised Kroenke didn't fleece the taxpayers for more than just tax breaks out of that deal (he's not my favorite person).

Privately funded with the NFL doing some of the funding.  I think the tab for SoFi ran about twice the  original estimate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BlackCats2013 said:

PSL prices for the NY stadium were crazy from what I remember. I believe lower sidelines were in the neighborhood of 30k per

I checked with a buddy who is a Giants season ticket-holder...

...he's 8th row on one of the goal lines and his were $10k.  I do believe I remember another friend citing $25k for Giants seats that had been in his family for decades --- probably some kind of club type option.  

It's worth noting 2 different fan bases were paying for a PSL on the same seat...Jets prices were lower.  

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...