Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Analyzing the 10 OL who should make the roster


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

Projected starters: Moton (RT), Paradis (C), Miller (RG), Elflein (LG)

Christensen, Erving, Scott are all not only competing for LT but have enough position flexibility to make the roster. Inject more youth with Deonte Brown + David Moore while keeping Dennis Daley over Greg Little due to aforementioned position flexibility.

I'm not so much excited for this year's OL as much as I am the following season's. I'm excited to see Christensen, Moore, Elflein, Brown, Moton if things pan out 👀

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

 

If I'm Rhule I'm giving Christensen every chance to fail at LT in TC / the preseason. 

I probably did not stress this point enough.  We run that wide zone blocking scheme and he might be a perfect fit for that--I just need to learn more about it---I think he would be a great G, but a good LT is greater than a great G, especially when you have a veteran or 2 at LG ready to play.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 07579394 said:

I don't think they will take 10 OLs,8 or 9,then could take more skill spots

It is possible that they go with 9 on the roster because they like versatility.  I really like David Moore and think he was a steal as an UDFA--so I forced him on the roster.  Did not think he'd last on the PS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Great post!  Thank you for sticking your neck like this to post something worth reading for a change.   Good onya mate! If we ever cross paths I'll buy you a beer.

Gonna hold you to that.  TY

When I saw who replied, I knew this would be a good thread--some very good counterpoints being made.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Gonna hold you to that.  TY

When I saw who replied, I knew this would be a good thread--some very good counterpoints being made.

A smartly written post and no mention of ‘he who shall not be named’ by anyone who responded.  Reading through to the end was actually rather pleasant.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good post, unfortunately our oline isn’t much to post about.

Paradis admitted late last year his injury is still hindering him. Big mean don’t heal - especially at his age. 

Fact is the line is looking pretty bad. Panthers have neglected it for so long. Well maybe not neglect, but have made horrible moves there. That’s probably worse. As important as the line is, I see it still a couple years away from being playoff caliber. 

Given the top teams to make the playoffs every year also so happen to have the top olines...it’s not looking good.

My main issue with the line last year was consistency. Easily the worst 3/4 quarter oline in the NFL. Except the Jets. The oline can be average but will have to be average for an entire game.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

After the draft, I think it was Verge who asked the best question that remained:  "So what do we have as an offensive line? (paraphrased)."  I think it is a great question. 

We still do not have answers for everyone left of right tackle, but we do have depth and competition.  Essentially, we are average across the front after Moton, but that is based on where we were and probably are--but it does not mean that is what we will be.

So I do this for myself and not for the Huddle, but I do not mind sharing.  Agree or disagree--there are  many ways this could go and I am pretty sure it won't go as predicted here.  I tried to analyze each player as objectively and as positively as possible.  These are the 10 OL I think could make the final roster:

  • Cam Erving:  Has some LT experience, experience at G as well.  Just does not come off as a LT1.  At his salary, he is a steal if he starts and is average, but I really was hoping that he would be solid depth.  Erving is smart, gives a lot of effort, but due to inexperience at any position, he is a bit behind.  Built to be the utility infielder, it is best for the Panthers if that is the role he plays here.  At his age, he is in his prime, so you are seeing his peak performance; he is what he is.  I would say that he will give 100% and he will learn quickly. Is 100% enough?  Not over the long haul.  Still the favorite to be starting week 1, in my opinion. Erving has said he is most comfortable at LT, and this may be his best chance to win a job there. 

     

  • Trent Scott: Scott was probably slightly below average last season, taking about a third of the LT snaps. That is admirable for a backup, and we know he should improve in 2021 because he was new to the system in 2020.  So I might go as far to say that he could reach average.  If Erving is average and Scott can be average, I feel better about LT than I did before the draft.  Having 2 LTs that are slightly below average to average is something you can live with IF you upgraded in other places.  Do not underestimate the value of Tremble here—and maybe a newer, better LG beside him will help.  I would give Scott a C- based on last year, with the upside of a C for 2021. 

     

  • Bradley Christensen:  Since nobody asked me, I have been watching Christensen’s videos and reading a few reviews from respected analysts and have come to this conclusion: He can play LT with a few weak spots or he could be a star Left Guard.  BC can handle the speed rushers and the benders; he can pull and reach the second level with ease.  He is great on screens.  Where he could run into trouble:  Bull Rushers.  He will struggle to keep the bigger, power rushers from plowing through his numbers.  He has short arms and a tiny anchor.  So if we can use Tremble to chip and offset that Bull rusher on longer plays from the pocket, he could be a serviceable LT.  But these flaws are minimized if he moves to G, and his athleticism is put more on display.  I think Rhule wants him to play G, honestly, because he sees it too.  Rookie, so grade is based on week 1 potential---LT: C-, LG: B-

     

  • Dennis Daley:  The forgotten man except in the “ice up” room, sometimes injuries happen in flurries.  You get one, it alters your technique and you get another.  A pulled groin can lead to a strained knee and that can lead to a hip pointer, for example.  Then everyone calls you “injury prone,” the NFL’s kiss of death. But Daley was drafted in 2019 with Greg Little, and as a sixth rounder, had some impressive outings.  Like in college, he was a bit inconsistent at LT, and was learning LG to start there in 2020 when the injury bug hit.  So we really do not know what we have in Daley; he could be our best LT, and he could be a versatile reserve as opposed to the injured reserve.  No grade, but we really (if you do not include Little) have 4 possible LTs on the roster, and all seem to be about on the same level at this time.  Daley is a LT, LG, and possibly the RT backup.

     

  • Pat Elflien:  I have watched Jets tape of Elf at G, and I have watched Vikings tape of Elf at C, where he won the Remington award as college football’s top C after being moved from G to C for his senior year at Ohio State.  Probably a better pass blocker than run blocker, and I like him at C more than G, which is good news, considering Paradis’ age. He does not blow anyone off the ball in the run game, but he usually makes his block.  He is very quick, and the more we pull him, the better off we will be.  He has never played on a good OL, so we shall see how effective he can be.  I see Elflien as the starting LG who will convert to C when Christensen becomes the LG or Paradis is benched. However, he may have a good relationship with Darnold, and the C/QB relationship is important.  (Yes, I think Brady C’s destiny is LG—and I hope LT works out). Based on what I have seen on film, and this does not jive with PFF, I give him a C+ at LG with an upside of a B- if he plays C.

     

  • Matt Paradis: Better in 2020 than in 2019 (recovering from a broken fibula), Paradis restructured his contract so he is going to be here at least one more year (2021) and should be the starting Center week 1. He was probably the OL’s second best performer in 2021 for those who played full schedules, but Miller could argue that he was the second best and win half the votes.  Paradis brings experience, and as his leg got stronger, so did he.  At 33, this is his last year, and his leadership and experience at C are probably needed.  He is more of a finesse, zone blocker and can get bull rushed into the QB. I would give him a C with a potential upside of B-.

     

  • John Miller:  Miller surprisingly exceeded expectations last year, but probably graded out at the bottom of the average range for RG.  He committed 6 penalties in 14 games (too high) and allowed too many sacks and hits on the qb—but was solid in the run game. He should improve in his second year with OL coach Pat Meyer, but there is a sixth round rookie at RG now who also wants to eat.   The competition will be fierce, and Miller is on a 1-year contract, so he knows they might be grooming D. Brown to take over.  Miller will start there week 1, and he will fight to keep his job or build his resume.  I give Miller a C- with the chance for a C+ with the extra motivation.

     

  • Deonte Brown: Is interesting  because he is an enigma.  He is built like a road-grading people mover, but he played LG at Bama and he played like a LG, and that position is probably more aligned with his college tape.  He is a smart blocker, almost a zone blocker at times, and rarely uses his 345 lbs to pave a path over the defender.  I think that will change when and if he is moved to RG, but the upside is this—in pass protection, he does not get bull rushed and he is able to adjust and pick up stunts and blitzes better than most men his size. He is not there yet, but I think coach Meyer can make this guy into a star.  I would have given him (at 347 lbs) a late third round grade, fwiw.  I think at 335 and with some technique development, he will be our starting RG soon. 

     

  • David Moore:  Normally I would not include an UDFA before the first practice in July, but since we are high on Moore, I think I will.  Moore is a bit short, but he is hard to move. Rhule played him some at center at Senior Bowl practices, and frankly, the drills in this video are impressive.  He is raw, but I think he could make the roster; I think if you put him on the PS, someone would pick him up.  For now, he is a third C, a third LG, and a third RG, but that is subject to change.  Here is a brief clip of Moore at the SR bowl—note the fact that he is not intimidated and how he stalemates the rush.  He gets beat on one rush, but recovers fairly well to minimize possible damage.  https://youtu.be/kh6ewsdqQMk

     

So if you ask me, I would predict that the Week 1 lineup looks like this:

 

LEFT TACKLE (C)

 

LEFT GUARD (C+)

 

CENTER  (C-)

 

RIGHT GUARD (C)

 

RIGHT TACKLE  (A)

 

Cam Erving

 

Pat Elflien

 

Matt Paradis

 

John Miller

 

Taylor Moton

 

Trent Scott

 

Dennis Daley

 

(Elflien)

 

Deonte Brown

 

(Scott)

 

Brad Christensen

 

(Christensen)

 

David Moore

 

 

 

 

 

But at some point during the season, I expect the OL to transform—it could look like this by then end:

 

LEFT TACKLE (C)

 

LEFT GUARD (B-)

 

CENTER (B-)

 

RIGHT GUARD (B-)

 

RIGHT TACKLE (A)

 

Cam Erving

 

Brad Christensen

 

Pat Elflien

 

Deonte Brown

 

Taylor Moton

 

Trent Scott

 

Dennis Daley

 

Matt Paradis

 

John Miller

 

(Scott)

 

(Daley)

 

(Moore)

 

David Moore

 

(Moore)

 

(Daley)

 

Green--rookies

Red--probably not going to be here next year

I'll admit to being a little hesitant to reading this at first (lams)...

This has been the best OP I've read in awhile. From anyone. I know, that time of year.  While your analysis I can't really disagree with, you presented your entire thought process well. From the fact that it just your own thoughts and just sharing.  Kudos man. 

I have been going back and forth over how I think, I think it may turn out. 😅

I truly belive that if the line is stronger across the inside, it allows the tackles be able to focus on their assignments better. 

That leads me to think that Christiansen should be our start let at LG to start the season. 

that doesn't mean he might not steal LT, just not sure that ends up leading to our best starting 5....

leaving the vet to start at LT like you are currently leaning to.

 

5 hours ago, saX man said:

Thanks for your continued posting volumes.  Helps keep good content while we're entering the deadzone.

I also like Trent Scott v. Erving battle if Christensen is at LG.  We traded up for Christensen and intended to pick him in R2 (per rumors) so I'd like to think he just starts at LG at a minimum.

LT wise: 

Scott last year: 347 snaps, 3 penalties, 2 sacks allowed

Erving: 279 snaps, 1 penalty, 1 sack allowed

If you look at Erving's old draft profiles, it's interesting.  A super athletic center/left tackle with high intelligence.  Almost all applaud his athleticism and proactiveness in the run game.  The negatives were his technique.

Erving's size: 6'5 315, 34.5" arms, 10"+ hands, 84"+ wingspan.

Scott's size: 6'5 320, 34 3/8" arms (can't find winsgspan but he should be right around 84" as well)

Both are better run blockers, both are very athletic for their size.  Erving seems to have allowed some more pressures but doesn't make as many mental errors.  Erving has also evolved to being a full time LT since he was in KC.

My guess:

Erving-Christensen-Paradis-Miller-Moton

 

This day 1 starting lineup I'd be okay with, but man oh man, the competition at that RG position is going to be unreal. 

 

Great thread guys. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OldhamA said:

He more than held his own against two first round DEs picked this year.

If I'm Rhule I'm giving Christensen every chance to fail at LT in TC / the preseason. 

Yeah, I watched some clips of him and the first thing that jumps out is his pass blocking technique. He pretty much takes the DE out of the play, however he needs a little work finding holes on run plays. But, a LT that can give Darnold confidence that he won’t be killed... priceless!!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think coach and fitt are counting on elf and Erving to be major impact players...don’t forget they were signed first hours of FA

scott is still an unknown, can he get better?

Daley is a sleeper , if he can stay on the field, he is pretty good

Will Brady make a contribution?...if he pans out that would be a huge plus...same with the bama kid

little still on rookie deal...may be the only reason he makes the team

Edited by Scott12345
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The product on the field has been bad and Im sure that has an impact.   That said I have to wonder if the in-person experience isnt losing its luster when pitted against 70"+ screens with DVRs and access to all the games, convenient and clean bathrooms, and comparatively cheap food and beer.
    • Has it ever occurred to you why blood sugar swings are a thing? If so, there are many factors to consider. The obvious ones are dietary, specifically the consumption of carbohydrates and sugar. Surprisingly, dehydration plays a role, as do medication intake, hormonal changes, and stress. That’s right, even emotional and physical triggers release certain hormones that outweigh the insulin hormone. Whatever the cause, when persistent, people risk experiencing symptoms such as dizziness, low energy, blurred vision, and feelings of weakness. One team claims to have developed a formula that stabilizes blood sugar levels while improving metabolic health for those riddled with swings between the highs and lows. In turn, this supplement’s dual-purpose nature can potentially unlock health benefits in different areas. Eager to find out more? Here is a summary of our findings on  What is Liponine™? Liponine™ is an all-natural dietary supplement in tincture format formulated to assist in regulating weight and blood sugar levels. The core of this formula was designed with the implications of an aging pancreas in mind, as well as the continued effects of inflammation and oxidative stress on overall health. Our editorial team was drawn to Liponine™ for two main reasons. First, it leverages three clinically studied blood sugar and weight management ingredients. Second, their strategy doesn’t come across as a temporary fix but as one that might make relevant corrections on a cellular level. To help put these elements together, our editorial team decided we needed to delve deeper into the creators, GDRLabs™ approach. How does Liponine™ work? Liponine™ is a dietary tincture developed to counteract the effects of an aging pancreas. The GDRLabs™ team explained how, in healthy people, carbohydrates are broken down into glucose, which is used as fuel by different bodily components. Cells, tissues, and organs rely on the insulin hormone’s help to absorb and use glucose. The pancreas releases this hormone and regulates and processes sugar floating around in the bloodstream. According to the creators, an aging pancreas cannot produce enough insulin, which causes blood sugar levels to fluctuate. In other words, low insulin levels indicate an excess of sugar in the bloodstream. These bodily components waiting for their fuel supply begin to suffer, namely experiencing weakness, dizziness, or sweatiness, to name a few of the minor side effects. When this condition is left unattended, individuals are putting themselves at risk of obesity, poor heart health and blood circulation, and, worse, amputation or death. If things aren’t bad enough for people with an aging pancreas, sugar addiction is like adding fuel to the burning fire. While it might not exactly be possible to reverse the aging nature of the pancreas, it is possible to tame fluctuations in blood sugar. As per GDRLabs™, Liponine™ comprises key nutrients that have a significant blood-lowering effect and several other secondary outcomes that elevate one’s overall wellness. Now’s probably a good time to dive into the foundation of Liponine™. What ingredients are in Liponine™? Liponine™ contains no more than three main ingredients combined in a 926 mg proprietary blend: Berberine Berberine is a plant-based chemical known for its bitter taste and medicinal properties. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that covered the effects of berberine on blood sugar levels in type 2 diabetic patients reported that the chemical could significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin. The former shows glucose levels after around 8 hours of fasting, whereas the latter measures the average blood sugar level over the past three months. The researchers also highlighted that berberine might be safe, as it neither increases the risk of side effects nor hypoglycemia. Another source that explained the different pathways by which berberine might improve blood sugar levels emphasized its ability to increase insulin sensitivity, promote insulin production and the breakdown of glucose, regulate metabolism, widen arteries (as a result of increased nitric oxide production), and slow the rate at which carbohydrates are absorbed in the gut. These results appear to stem from a dose ranging between 600 and 1,500 mg daily. Curcumin Curcumin is a bioactive compound derived from turmeric, a flowering plant belonging to the Zingiberaceae family. This ingredient is best known for its anti-inflammatory properties, which might be handy in regulating blood sugar levels. Our editorial team stumbled upon a recent systematic review that assessed whether curcumin affects blood sugar levels. Ultimately, the researchers concluded that its anti-diabetic activity is attributed to its ability to suppress oxidative stress and inflammatory processes. Furthermore, it was mentioned that curcumin significantly reduces fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin, and body mass index. Circling back on the notion of “oxidative stress”, this occurs when there is an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in the body. When the former overtakes the latter, several chain chemical reactions occur in the body called oxidation, which mostly has harmful impacts. Normally, the role of the antioxidant is to donate an electron to the unstable free radical to neutralize it; however, with an imbalance favoring the bad, the result is excess oxidation. What does this mean for blood sugar levels? An oxidative environment might increase insulin resistance, impair beta cells (linked to insulin performance) and glucose tolerance, and deteriorate mitochondrial function, all of which contribute to creating a diabetic state. Green Tea Extract Green tea extract is a concentrated form of green tea made from the Camella sinensis plant. As one source underlines, a single serving of the extract (which is small) is said to contain the same amount of active ingredients as an average cup of green tea. Its health benefits stem from its rich source of antioxidants, namely catechins like epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). This ingredient naturally helps increase the body’s antioxidant capacity, which, as discussed earlier, is essential for neutralizing the effects of free radicals. As a result of this property, individuals can anticipate several benefits. Particularly, research has demonstrated epigallocatechin gallate’s ability to decrease inflammation, blood pressure, and blood fat levels, improve brain function (by protecting brain cells from oxidative stress), induce weight loss results (by regulating hormones that increase thermogenesis), promote healthy liver function, and lead to overall improvements in the skin. Regarding blood sugar, the same source found studies that confirmed EGCG’s role in increasing insulin sensitivity and regulating blood sugar production, thereby lowering blood sugar levels. Again, this might be a dose-dependent outcome requiring 1,500 mg. Other ingredients that support the main ingredients include black pepper extract and D-limonene. The former has been included to increase the body’s ability to absorb curcumin, whereas the latter further heightens the formula’s anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. For those who are curious about the chemistry or how specific concentrations and solvents are used, here is a quick summary: Berberine HCL – 3L (30 kg: 43.5 L) in 10% Ethanol Turmeric Root Extract (95% Curcuminoids) – 5.5L (25 kg: 47.5L) in 10% Ethanol Green Tea 50% Caffeine Extract Powder – 0.5L (1 kg: 3L) in 10% Ethanol Black Pepper Extract Powder – 18L (1 kg: 18L) in 100% Ethanol Take the example of Berberine. The above breakdown suggests that 30 liters (in volume) of berberine were used to prepare the batch. The ratio in the brackets likely indicates that 30 liters return 43.5 liters of solution. Finally, ethanol appears to be the solvent used to dissolve the ingredient. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Q. What makes Liponine™ superior to other blood sugar formulas? A. Liponine™ is superior to other blood sugar formulas for several reasons. At the top of the list is their patented DualPolar™ extraction process. Specifically, the berberine found in this formula was mixed into a precise blend of extract solvents – acting like magnets – that separate active compounds from their plant matters. The result is a full-spectrum extraction of all 64 indole alkaloids normally found within berberine, ensuring that people are getting 100% for what they are paying. The GDRLabs™ team added liquid piperine to this mix, which increases berberine’s bioavailability by 3,000%. Other features that give this tincture a competitive edge include manufacturing processes in America (under strict and sterile conditions), third-party lab testing (for maximum potency and safety), and being plant-based and cruelty-free. Q. Is Liponine™ safe? A. Based on the list of ingredients and their associated concentrations per serving, Liponine™ appears to be a safe tincture to take. As with any dietary supplement (regardless of format), it is imperative to dig further into matters and/or have a full-on discussion with a healthcare provider before getting started. This is especially important for those who are pregnant, nursing, or taking prescription medications. Q. Are there other ingredients in Liponine™ that I should be aware of? A. Yes, other ingredients likely added to create the tincture’s base and flavor profile include olive oil, ethyl alcohol, and strawberry flavoring. Q. How do I take Liponine™? A. The recommended serving size is 1 ml (or a single dropper) of Liponine™. To get started, individuals are asked to shake the bottle well. Then, it is a matter of taking one serving orally and waiting 30 seconds before swallowing it. This process should be repeated every day. Q. What types of results can I expect from Liponine™? A. Liponine™ is believed to induce weight loss results, increase digestion, and promote healthy glucose levels. Q. How long will it take to see a difference with Liponine™? A. According to the GDRLabs™ team, Liponine™ has been subjected to several test groups. Participants have generally reported some change within the first day (normally in terms of energy); however, to experience a noticeable change, this supplement must be taken for at least 30 days. Consistency is key, as the compounding effect over time will reward users. Q. Does Liponine™ have any side effects? A. No side effects have allegedly been reported during their years of clinical testing, but as always, each person is unique and should, therefore, look further into the formula beforehand. Q. What is the difference between Liponine™ regular and clinical strengths? A. The difference rests in the potency. Liponine™ Clinical Strength offers double the dose of its key ingredients for maximum impact. This might be suitable for people with significant health challenges related to blood sugar and metabolic function. Q. What is the estimated arrival time for Liponine™ shipments? A. Orders typically take 24 to 72 hours to process before shipping them out. From there, most contiguous American states’ estimated arrival time ranges between 5 and 7 business days. For international shipments, customers are responsible for applicable taxes and customs charges, with the arrival time ranging between 2 and 5 weeks. The higher the price paid for shipping, the sooner the packages will arrive. Q. Does a money-back guarantee protect Liponine™purchases? A. Yes, Liponine™ has been protected by a 90-day money-back guarantee. If individuals have little to say about the improvements within the first 90 days of taking this supplement, customer support can be reached for a full purchase price refund. Unused bottles are guaranteed a complete refund, whereas certain used bottles might be eligible for a partial refund. This is a discussion to have with the customer support team, possibly in one of the following ways: Phone number: (629) 276-4922 Mailing address: 1360 Union Hill Road, Alpharetta, GA 30004   How much does Liponine™ cost? Each Liponine™ (regular-strength) bottle contains 50 drops, enough to last a month. With that, the current going price is $29, which has been reduced from the original price of $63. GDRLabs™: Setting the Standards High for Innovation & Superiority GameDay Ready™ (GDRLabs™, for short) is a health and wellness supplement provider with a reputable status in American manufacturing. They had heads turning for their renowned Conolidine formula, developed to provide targeted muscle and joint therapy. Five areas helped this team introduce innovative solutions while setting high standards for others. First and foremost, GDRLabs™ takes pride in its 100% American manufacturing processes. This means that it’s sidestepped outsourcing to maintain standards and avoid compromises. Second, it has introduced an approach that guarantees potency, quality, and freshness with each bottle. Third, GDRLabs™ is deemed an embodiment of superiority, as its solutions result from research, exclusive craftsmanship, and consistency. Next, they’ve employed what’s called PureDemand™, an on-demand manufacturing process originally designed for elite athletes. The latter contributes to the second and third facets mentioned previously. Finally, and coinciding with the first, are their ongoing efforts to guarantee increased potency. If there’s anything to take away from everything, the team feels it’s probably this: “Liponine™ is formulated with naturally occurring compounds, ensuring a safe alternative to synthetic medications. This natural composition minimizes the risk of side effects, making it a suitable option for long-term use in managing blood sugar levels and supporting metabolic health.” Final Verdict From the discussion above, it should be clear that Liponine™ was formulated with metabolic health and blood sugar in mind. The GDRLabs™ team tapped into the health benefits and clinical evidence of berberine, green tea, and curcumin, which is clever on their part. Not only were they able to arrive at a simple solution, but they also found ways to ensure that each serving was complete (with nothing going to waste due to low bioavailability). Our research on the ingredients aligns with many of the statements made by the GDRLabs™ team, which is likely to reassure many individuals.  
    • My buddy and I sold ours for the cost of the transfer fee. He listed them on Marketplace and found someone interested. He wanted them for his kids. I told my buddy to report him for child abuse.
×
×
  • Create New...