Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Athletic - Sam Darnold Film Analysis


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

It was a good article of both his good and bad points.   
 

One bad part was “An issue that shows up in Darnold’s film is that he doesn’t do a good enough job of getting to his checkdown. 

He better work through that with CMC in the backfield.  And more likely it’s having CMC will help him get better at check downs.  
 

LIsn’t it ironic that we are going from one extreme to the other.  We just jettisoned “Checkdown Charlie” and replaced with a guy at the other extreme. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

It was a good article of both his good and bad points.   
 

One bad part was “An issue that shows up in Darnold’s film is that he doesn’t do a good enough job of getting to his checkdown. 

He better work through that with CMC in the backfield.  And more likely it’s having CMC will help him get better at check downs.  
 

LIsn’t it ironic that we are going from one extreme to the other.  We just jettisoned “Checkdown Charlie” and replaced with a guy at the other extreme. 

I have an eerie idea that CMC won't really be the "checkdown" in reality.

He may be the first or second read on lots of plays.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thefuzz said:

I have an eerie idea that CMC won't really be the "checkdown" in reality.

He may be the first or second read on lots of plays.

I'm not so sure. We threw to the RB a lot less last year, and that's with Teddy throwing it to them as a check down more than we would have liked.

I understand CMC wasn't out there, but I'm just not entirely sure that throwing to the RB is going to be as big a part of our offense as it was under Norv Turner. The man helped make throwing to the RB an art form in today's NFL.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

I'm not so sure. We threw to the RB a lot less last year, and that's with Teddy throwing it to them as a check down more than we would have liked.

I understand CMC wasn't out there, but I'm just not entirely sure that throwing to the RB is going to be as big a part of our offense as it was under Norv Turner. The man helped make throwing to the RB an art form in today's NFL.

Agreed. I don't think we are going to return to seeing CMC targeted 130+ times in the passing game for a season. He is a PART of the offense, not the entire offense.

I would be pretty disappointed if Darnold isn't testing defenses deep at a substantially higher rate than Teddy did.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Agreed. I don't think we are going to return to seeing CMC targeted 130+ times in the passing game for a season. He is a PART of the offense, not the entire offense.

I would be pretty disappointed if Darnold isn't testing defenses deep at a substantially higher rate than Teddy did.

I don't want to see a Sammy that tries to play safe, mistake free ball throwing high percentage passes.

I want the scrambling gunslinger who's buying time to make the big plays wherever  they show up. That's a Cardiac Cats type of QB that makes it fun to watch. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I don't want to see a Sammy that tries to play safe, mistake free ball throwing high percentage passes.

I want the scrambling gunslinger who's buying time to make the big plays wherever  they show up. That's a Cardiac Cats type of QB that makes it fun to watch. 

I don't think he is even capable of playing that conservative style of football anyway. He has always been a gunslinger. 

If we or he tried to change that, he'd probably be out of the league in a season.

We don't need to reinvent the wheel, we just need him to make progress as far as making progressions, making reads and not generally going full Favre.

  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

For check down stuff hopefully it'll be CMC and/or Tremble off chip block options. Also DJ and Robby get way more separation than whatever the Jets were using as WR's. Gase really ran some lose/lose plays where Sams only option was to go backyard football

I am curious to see if that was the offense or Sam just leans backyard football when it all breaks down(which most gunslingers do) anyway. The one thing we can say about Teddy, is that he rarely ever went off script. 

I think he'll see plenty of pressure in 2021, so we will get a good side by side of what his tendencies are in this offense versus Gase's.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

He better work through that with CMC in the backfield.  And more likely it’s having CMC will help him get better at check downs.  
 

Would you check the ball down if it’s to a 67 year old Frank gore? The jets refused to play their younger RBs in favor of gore for some reason. He hasn’t been known as a check down specialist very much during his career. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • then we're stuck.  tbh, at this point i would settle for just making it interesting. forget winning a superbowl for now. just get a team that can win games consistently and hope that it's enough to get to the big dance.  we want superman. we aren't getting superman. we had him and we blew our chance with him.  find a way make it work and hope that we can with this little guy and quit wishing our lives away for the second coming of superman. it just ain't happening.
    • Gonna have to strongly disagree with you here. Here are the last 20 Super Bowls - only two of them IMO had QB that didn't play like Superman to get them there/win the game/both, and that was Peyton in 2015 and Ben in 2005. Even then they both had that ability, Peyton was just old and Ben young. That said, there were flashes in the pan like Foles in 2017 and (to a lesser degree) Flacco in 2012. But even counting that, it's 4/20. 20% odds aren't good enough and Bryce was absolutely drafted at #1 to be a guy that elevates an entire team and plays like Superman. If he can't do that then it's a failed pick, full stop. Being a poor man's Teddy doesn't cut it for a #1 overall and that's true for any team, not just Carolina.
    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
×
×
  • Create New...